Castleberry Hill

Steering Committee Findings

Recomended Regulations

Castleberry Hill


www.castleberryhill.org


Steering Committee Findings


Regarding Neighborhood Zoning and Design Guidelines


5/15/00


WHEREAS, The Castleberry Hill Neighborhood Association has formed a Steering Committee to draft recommendations regarding zoning and design guidelines for the neighborhood; and


WHEREAS, neighborhood developers have joined the Committee to provide their expertise regarding the realities of development; and


WHEREAS, the recommendations of the Committee are a result of the Neighborhood Master Plan administered by the City's Planning Department; and


WHEREAS, the City's Planning Department has encouraged the Neighborhood Association through the Master Planning effort to develop design guidelines and zoning regulations; and


WHEREAS, the Steering Committee has studied the physical characteristics of the neighborhood, current zoning and land use, and history;


NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE STEERING COMMITTEE AND BROUGHT TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION FOR APPROVAL as follows:


General Statement of Intent




  1. To preserve the Castleberry Hill National Register District's historic pattern and distribution of building types that are characterized primarily by railroad service, warehouse-distribution, and small retail- commercial buildings, many of which were constructed in the early 20th century.

  2. To encourage economic development and a variety of housing opportunities; to foster neighborhood revitalization; and to encourage an economically and culturally diverse population.

  3. To promote a livable, sustainable neighborhood with pedestrian convenience and connectivity; to better connect buildings to the public life of the street; and to better reflect the planning policies of the City's CDP ("all buildings shall front on streets or squares" 20-45).


Boundaries and Scope


These recommendations are applied to the area shown on the attached map, which is the area of Castleberry Hill Neighborhood with the following additions:




  1. The addition of the Peters Street Bridge.

  2. The addition of the Parcel(s) at the northeast corner of Mitchell and Techwood.


The boundaries of Castleberry Hill Neighborhood are divided into three Subareas as depicted on the attached map, (click here to view the Proposed Neighborhood Subareas). Committee recommendations for each subarea are as follows:



WEB BROWSER NOTE- image of the map requires a browser that supports the PDF file format and the download time is approximately 1-min.





  1. SUBAREA 1: The intent for Subarea 1 is to protect the core of the Neighborhood which is comprised of early twentieth century historic railroad service, warehouse-distribution, and small retail-commercial buildings.




  1. BOUNDARY. The boundary of Subarea 1 is the boundary of the existing National Register District except as follows:





- The boundary of Subarea 1 extends east to the Railway.


- The boundary of Subarea 1 includes the parcels which front at the west side of Walker.







  1. HEIGHT. The Committee believes it is important to develop height regulations which preserve the compatibility of visual qualities and spatial relationships that exist between buildings in the Register District.






The historic buildings are primarily one, two, and three stories in height. The committee has studied topography, height of existing buildings, current land values, and development trends with the following findings:



- The Swift Building is approximately 42 feet in height.


- 200 Walker is approximately 46 feet in height.


- Because these buildings are above average in height, the Steering Committee recommends 40 feet measured at any frontage street as a controlling height number.


- To avoid penalizing the low lying site east of Peters which has been included in Subarea 1, the Committee recommends the baseline for measuring buildings east of Peters be at Peters Street.







  1. SETBACK. The Committee recognizes it is important to compliment the historic pattern of buildings aligning at the street. At the same time, the Committee recognizes the need for adequate sidewalks for pedestrian safety and sidewalk activities. Therefore, the Committee recommends regulations that:





- Produce a minimum of 10 foot and maximum of 15 foot sidewalks along Peters Street by action which takes back the street and preserves the continuous uninterrupted frontage of buildings at the street.


- Produce a minimum of 9 foot and maximum of 15 foot sidewalks elsewhere.


- Produce design criteria for what structures are appropriate in setbacks.


- Develop and promote the use of a Pedestrian Space Plan for the Neighborhood


- The Committee further recommends that when retail is the use that the customer entrance be at the street.


 









  1. Architectural Standards. The intent of architectural standards would be to:





    1. To set forth basic minimum standards that are compatible with the existing historic buildings within the neighborhood. The intent is not to limit the design of new housing to replication or existing structures, but to foster design of massing, size, scale, materials, and elements to enhance the built quality of the Neighborhood while encouraging creativity. The Committee recognizes that in addition to height and setback, the actual visual image of the building is important to preserving the character of the Neighborhood.

    2. Alterations and additions should be clearly differentiated, but acknowledge scale and material so that a false historical appearance is not created. Alterations and additions should be in accordance with the U.S. Secretary of the Interior Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Restoring Historic Buildings.





2. Subarea 2: The intent of Subarea 2 is to encourage Neighborhood Oriented development under relaxed height restrictions on mostly vacant land which is targeted for revitalization by a neighborhood developer.


A. BOUNDARY. (See map.)



WEB BROWSER NOTE- image of the map requires a browser that supports the PDF file format and the download time is approximately 1-min.








      1. HEIGHT. The Committee recommends three height zones for Subarea 2:












    • Buildings or portions of buildings east of Northside Drive and west of a line which is 250 feet from the east right of way of Northside, as indicated on the attached map, may be a maximum of 70 feet in height at any frontage

    • Buildings east of the 70 foot height zone but west of Subarea 1 may be a maximum of 40 feet in height as indicated on the attached map.

    • Other buildings to the north of Nelson, as indicated on the map, may be a maximum of 50 feet in height.











    1. SETBACK. To encourage neighborhood oriented development and pedestrian connectivity:









        1. A minimum 15 foot sidewalk at Northside Drive

        2. Minimum 9 foot sidewalks elswhere.

        3. Parking behind, rather than fronting, buildings.

        4. Buildings which front on streets or squares.

        5. 5. The Committee further recommends that when retail is the use that the customer entrance be at the
          street.


          3. Subarea 3: The Committee has heard from owners in this area and recommends zoning which will protect their revitalization efforts and encourage further revitalization by limiting some uses and promoting residential and retail uses in this area. The committee recommends:



          A. HEIGHT. No restrictions beyond what is currently in place.


          B. SETBACK. To encourage neighborhood oriented development and pedestrian connectivity:


          1. A minimum 15 foot sidewalk at Whitehall and Spring.


          2. Minimum 9 foot sidewalks elsewhere.


          3. Parking behind, rather than fronting, buildings.


        6. Buildings which front on streets or squares.

        7. The committee further recommends that when retail is the use that the customer entrance be at the street.










C. ZONING. Rezoning of I-1 to a Commercial zoning in order to eliminate environmental contamination and allow and encourage residential uses, while at the same time preserving the light industrial uses of the owners who have revitalized that area.




4. Recommendations which apply to all Subareas. In addition to the above, the Committee recommends:










      1. Prohibition of the following uses:










        1. Parking lots for hire, unless specifically dedicated for uses within the neighborhood

        2. Adult entertainment establishments.

        3. Retail sale of liquor and wine.

        4. Heavy industry

        5. Tow lots

        6. Gas station

        7. Automobile repair and body shops

        8. Automobile sales lots










      1. In order to minimize curb cuts, regulations which would permit shared drives.

      2. Regulations that prohibit drive-throughs.

      3. Regulations that discourage environmental contamination from businesses like dry-cleaners.

      4. Regulations that discourage parking pressure on Subarea 1 from other areas.

      5. Regulations that spell out the variance process and criteria for granting a variance.

      6. Improved Neighborhood review of issues, and improved communication between City and Neighborhood, possibly through the internet.







5. Mechanism. The Committee met with city planning staff and entered into preliminary discussions of potential zoning mechanisms. Because of the technical nature of these mechanisms it is important to research and understand the implications for the Neighborhood of each option. The following options have been discussed in committee and throughout the planning effort:










      1. All of Castleberry Hill would be a Landmark District with different Subareas.

      2. The Core of Castleberry Hill would be a Landmark District and other Subareas would be Historic Districts.

      3. A new SPI district would supplant existing zoning. The core would have a Landmark District Overlay. A critical aspect of this mechanism would be designing the SPI regulations so that appropriate neighborhood review was maintained.





Committee Members:


Bill Bounds


David Butler


Bruce Gallman


(Russ McCall)*


(Ms. Heath)*


Jerry Hoy


Herman Russell


Jim Schneider


Kate Siegel


Alycen Whiddon


*Member was informed and participated through Mr. Gallman.


C:\Projects\98008\DesignCriteria\DraftRegulations\Resolution5-15.doc



Sponsored Links
Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_2518034-hot-pizza.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow

Zip Code Profiler

30313 Zip Code Details

Neighborhoods, Home Values, Schools, City & State Data, Sex Offender Lists, more.