Bell Ridge Homeowners Association

and again, you are missing some facts.  

the requirement to dissolve was not that 2/3 of the votes cast had to be no.  the requirement to dissolve was that 2/3 of the homeowners eligible to vote had to vote no. 

64 votes is far less than the number needed to dissolve.  the vote was not even close.

Excuse me I wrote section D,  I meant C.     

Excuse me I wrote section D,  I meant C.     

 

I posted this once , so i'll post it again:

 I am a homeowner who was opposed to the HOA.    Since the rules have changed in the middle of the game with Secition D not being included, I think we should have another election on the future of this HOA.   Being that the first street on the left and the new subdivision in the rear will not be a part, I just don't see that being surrounded by homes with no obligations or restrictions, that our effort, money, and frustrations could benefit us.   I have been apart of a HOA in the past, and it was always surrounded by politics, corruption, and bickering.   The City of Hernando already has in place ordinaces that doesn't differ much from our  HOA laws.    With what we are finding out now and seeing this HOA is really alot of frustrations on both sides, I think if we had another election that we would blow away the 2/3 votes necessary to dissolve.   Afterall, it was only one vote away from that with such a minimal participation.     The last election only proved to me that most people didn't care or was against it.   I don't understand the 2/3 anyway,  whatever happened to majority rules?    And in closing, I do appreciate the board for what they have tried to accomplish and their good intentions behind this,  but now it's time to reassess this situation.   

What are the requirements to be an eligible voter?  Was I an eligible voter?  When you sent out the proxy ballots, did you inform the homeowner these requirements?  Can you explain in greater detail why the vote was not even close?  How many of the "no" votes were eligible and how many of the "no" votes were not eligible.