Town of Braintree

Whats The Buzz,341 Tons Here

In an Oct. 10, 2004, letter to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Mohammed J. Abbas, general director of the Iraqi Ministry of Science and Technology's Planning and Following Up Directorate, reported that 195 tons of high-melting explosive, 141 tons of rapid-detonating explosive, and 6 tons of pentaerythrite tetranitrate, another type of explosive commonly known as PETN, ''registered under the IAEA custody were lost'' after April 9, 2003.

Abbas blamed the loss on ''the theft and looting of the governmental installations due to lack of security.''


By Rapid-Detonating Explosive(RDX)

Who's Going to Pick Our Presiden


Who's Going to Pick Our President?
let me summarize this whole story for you from the New York Times that Kerry is basing his whole campaign on in a little different way. Who's going to pick our next president? I know, we've got voters, they might pick the next president in the battleground states. Those are the only voters that might matter. In fact, some are saying it really doesn't matter what any of the rest of us do, it's what happens in Ohio or what happens in Florida or maybe Michigan or Pennsylvania.

Well, like it or not, that's democracy. When the voters choose, some states are locked in, some aren't. They're battleground states and other states aren't, some are swing states but that's democracy. What is not democracy is having our election determined by Mohammed ElBaradei, James Glanz, William Broad and David Sanger, Abu Jalal, and 60 Minutes. Mohammed ElBaradei is the man who leaked the October Surprise to the New York Times. He's the chief UN nuclear inspector. He got the dirty trick that Kerry is basing his whole campaign on now started. His term is ending. He knows American wants to boot him out and replace him. He failed to find the nuclear program in Libya, failed to handle the program in Iran and North Korea. He was standing idly by when the Indians in Pakistan went to the nuclear brink. He's been totally ineffective.


Mohammed ElBaradei wants President Bush to lose even more than the New York Times does. James Glanz, William Broad, David Sanger, who are they? They are the so-called journalists paid by the New York Times to report this 19-month-old, unsubstantiated charge about explosives being ''looted,'' right under the eyes, the watchful eyes of the incompetent Bush and U.S. military in order to damage the president a week before the election. They wrote the damn thing. They wrote this fraudulent story, based on old news, based on nothing new, and nothing new and based on no definitive date when these explosives went missing. Abu Jalal is just one of the ''resistance leaders'' -- I prefer the term ''insane terrorists'' -- in Iraq who comes right out and says the following: ''The mounting violence and already hurt Mr. Bush's chances, American elections and Iraq are linked tightly together.'' He told a Fallujah-based Iraqi reporter, ''We've gotta work to change election and we've done so. With our strikes we've dragged Bush into the mud.''

So what you have here is a three-way collaboration to turn your vote to influence the election, to change the election. Mohammed ElBaradei, James Glanz, William Broad, David Sanger, the New York Times, and the insane terrorists -- among many others, Abu Jalal. And if that's not enough I'll throw one more in here. 60 Minutes. Dan Rather and the gang, week after week, hit piece after hit piece, some using forged documents, made-up facts that are not facts obviously, designed to destroy George Bush and affect the outcome of the presidential election, all designed to set you up for the October Surprise of all time: The munitions allegation leaked by Mohammed ElBaradei.

So when America goes to vote, who's going to be in the booth with them? The New York Times, 60 Minutes, Mohammed ElBaradei and Abu Jalal? I hope not. But clearly those will be the people influencing some people's votes in this country today, next week, and Senator Kerry is doing his best to capitalize on Mohammed ElBaradei, Abu Jalal, the New York Times and 60 Minutes.




By Mohammed ElBaradei

You won't have to run far. They

Goodbye Mr Kerry; So Long, Disengagement''

In a few days, Americans will choose between voting for George Bush, or for John Kerry.

In the US, those who are called in the polls ''undecided'' have to choose between voting for Bush and voting against the war. It is clear that the contest in the US this time is between G. W. Bush and the war in Iraq. Probably only a few voters are faced with the dilemma of voting for Bush or for Mr. Kerry's fascinating, charismatic personality, and his personal history as a public figure.

And yet, people understand what the vote is about. Sending George W. Bush back to his Texas ranch next week will be a victory for the Bin-Ladens and Saddams. It will be a painful blow to the brave decision America made as a nation, to sacrifice the lives of their troops, billions of their dollars and a lot of world sympathy for the benefit of Free World interests and values.

It always amazed me how much energy the American liberal and anti-war circles have spent on bashing the administration on the issue of where the Iraqi WMD really are, or how come they have not been found. Suppose Saddam Hussein was only pretending he had them, and managed brilliantly to deceive both Israeli and American top intelligence agencies. So? Was he not a destabilizing force in the Middle East? Was he not committed to truly obtain those weapons at the first chance he would get? Did he not annihilate Kuwait? Has he not fired 42 Scud missiles at Israeli cities during the first Gulf War ?– proving that if he will ever get his hands on those unconventional toys, he would use them, immediately, and with no provocation on Israel's part? Is this not a First World affair? Has he not murdered hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis and more Kurds, and planted them in mass graves all over the desert? What exactly is there to apologize for? And what about Afghanistan? Why are they (anti-war groups) not mentioning that? Why is the Bin-Laden-Afghanistan link acceptable, and the Saddam Hussein?–Iraq link not?

And so, the vote this next week is a statement. A statement that the Americans are not fooling around when it comes to choosing between good and bad in the world. A statement of commitment to true global values. It is hard for a free country to fight a war on the other side of the globe. It is easy to think, if you are an American, ''We have no business over there.'' And this is exactly what the vote is about. Between those who painfully accept the role of the US as a sole world superpower, and understand the responsibility that goes with the benefits, and those who don't. Plain and simple.

The 'Kerrys' in America are good people. They hate war. They despise conflict. They want peace badly. They just forget one thing. A reluctance to use force, hesitance to punish the aggressor, never pays off in the long run. You may be tempted to run away from the Bin-Ladens, Husseins and Ayatollahs of the world. You won't have to run far. They will come to you.




By Goodbye Mr Kerry So Long

Yeah George Steinbrenner !!!!!

You're outa here !!!!