Yes this is the stuff successful
Yes this is the stuff successful lawsuits are made off! To take down only a part of so large a structure requires sound engineering experience, the use of explosives would add unknown unrevealed stresses to the now weakened total!
How could a contractor evaluate the stability of a structure so weakened without close observations and some kind of stressing testing which would/could lead to total collapse!
Why would Quincy issue such a partial demolition permit, have the people issuing the Quincy permits engineering degrees or did they consult an engineering service to advise them?
Where they even concerned with the structure?’s stability after a partial demolition?
Why where these people at the site attempting to take down the rest by hand? Why would anyone spend any time under a weakened unstable structure when it was being taken down?
The questions a well trained legal adversary would ask would be difficult to answer!
There is little common sense at work here that I can observe! When the Braintree permit was denied was a valid reason given? Why was a hand demolition allowed, who gave permission for that? I believe Braintree is in great legal danger at this juncture and is wide open for a major
judgement against it!
By evaluatestability of a structure
Yes this is the stuff successful lawsuits are made off! To take down only a part of so large a structure requires sound engineering experience, the use of explosives would add unknown unrevealed stresses to the now weakened total!
How could a contractor evaluate the stability of a structure so weakened without close observations and some kind of stressing testing which would/could lead to total collapse!
Why would Quincy issue such a partial demolition permit, have the people issuing the Quincy permits engineering degrees or did they consult an engineering service to advise them?
Where they even concerned with the structure?’s stability after a partial demolition?
Why where these people at the site attempting to take down the rest by hand? Why would anyone spend any time under a weakened unstable structure when it was being taken down?
The questions a well trained legal adversary would ask would be difficult to answer!
There is little common sense at work here that I can observe! When the Braintree permit was denied was a valid reason given? Why was a hand demolition allowed, who gave permission for that? I believe Braintree is in great legal danger at this juncture and is wide open for a major
judgement against it!
By evaluatestability of a structure