Bridgewood

re: Address

First of all, two streets is not giving out an address. If there was never a physical address and/or specific name or any other identifying information released to the public then no, he did not break the rules of confidentiality.

Second, under the same Amendment you speak about, it gives us the right to the freedom of speech. That does not say that specific people are allowed to speak and those others are not. Personally, if he was not held to the HOA within a confidentiality agreement, there is nothing he did wrong again. He has the right to an opinion and the right to exercise that opinion.

I really think you need to do a little more research into the information you are using to base your opinion on. Facts outweigh the right to an opinion anytime. You can't even exercise your right to an opinion in a court of law without having the necessary legal grounds to back it up.

By the way, I know you are going to ignore my question, but do you actually participate with the HOA by volunteering for anything?

Correction

I meant to say identifying information *of a personal nature*...


And, You can't even exercise your right *OF* an opinion...

re:

your right giving out two streets is not giving out a address but when you put in about a big huge barn it would be easy to spot. yes you do have freedom of speech but he should have posted his opinion being him self and not the web master who should have not had a opinion.

why that a good question and do you volunteer to help? th only people i see are the same people that have done it for years.