To Adrian and WW

Thanks.

Adrian; thank you for finding the error; would be a useless post had you not found that!

By Br Anonymous

Another Typo


Our average for posting accurate links is falling. The correct email address is:

CVELG@aol.com

I hope this did not cause any problems for anyone.



By Adrian

BBW,John,Oliver: Chicken Baking?

What has happened to the trio? Are you afraid to answer questions posed on this board; afraid that we have discovered too much that may just prove to be not only unethical but questionably legal? If not answer these questions; specifically, without evasive language.

1. Why did CBLG open with $11,665 in account without identifying the donor(s)? Why the absolute need to hide the resource? Was this city money or city money filtered through a city supported entity?

2. Public Participation in Council Meetings: (just in case you have forgotten)
A. Citizens comments: "Under this section of the meeting citizens of BF have an opportunity to comment on items not on the printed agenda. This is the time for residents to ask about something involving the city, or to request the city council consider making or changing a policy..(usually a three minute limit).
B. City Manager's Report: City Manager reports on any administrative items which the City Council may need information on.
Question: Since decisions about proceeding with the county ballot AND George DiCero's intent to act as a private citizen were under City Manager's report; were these ADMINISTRATIVE ITEMS which the council may need information on?
3. Why the hired Lobbyists at state assembly? Did taxpayers money pay for the hired lobbyists? With your favorite 62% majority; where were all the citizens working for CBLG. We both know that this political activist group was both formed and chaired by Council Members; but surely there were enough council relatives that could have played the role of "concerned citizen" to the state members.

4. Why, in publications to voters of Colorado, not print the ballot in totality:
Question 2A: An Advisory Question
Shall the City of Broomfield consider placing a question on the statewide general election ballot that would amend the Colorado Constitution to authorize the creation of a city and county?
Why was the word "CONSIDER" changed to "PURSUE". Of course, this cannot be considered a typo error. This is obviously intentional to hide the true question on the ballot.

6. I have been checking on your statements that there is no link between Interlocken, the Northwest Parkway, and the county; so far you have tried to paint this as a "fool's midnight dream". Please explain to me how a city buys votes on a board; and who pays the outrageous price for those votes. Again, are we looking at taxpayer's monies being mis-used by the city; or is this being filtered through a city-sponsored entity; or is Interlocken now close to 2 million in donations to the NWP development? This is contrary to what Berens said; there would be equity in the votes. Why did we buy so many at such an outrageous price? Are we afraid of losing? Who truly benefits besides a direct route between Interlocken and Interlocken 2; whose property value is increasing; Interlocken with a direct route to DIA, or the citizens of Broomfield home values. You, yourself, have stated, that CITIZEN assessments will decrease as commercial property increases.
3. Are we seeing this annexations with Weld county as a part of the total picture to increase population and support another Interlocken? Why is this area at I-25 and NWP still being presented to the public as a future retail site; not a business park? Why not the truth?

Failure to answer any one or all of these questions tells me that CVELG has accomplished its purpose: The government of BF is corrupt; and we have found a way to win. Is your chicken baking..and is the government of BF the chicken?

By Br Anonymous

Uncontrolled laughter!!!

Go to Broomfieldnews.com, countdown to a county and read the funny story: "SURVEY TO GAUGE WISHES of BROOMFIELD RESIDENTS""

Broomfield residents will be asked next year what they LIKE about their city and what they want included in their new county.

The city has budgeted $57,500 for a "CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY".
(That money could be used to fix a few roads around here!!)
Can you believe this garbage? BF leaders does not want anything bad to come out of this survey. They just wanted to promote that they are nice, gentle, caring, (Slobber, slobber,) leaders. I wonder if those who dare to state that some things suck will be put on a "hit list".

But then maybe they will only survey those CBLG members who are now on committees dominated by the council!!!

This is a crock of crap.

Gee they are even looking for ideas for the city and county; but it this stupid survey wont be done until next year when all the budgets are completed. Is this a citizen involvement cover-up.

If you are called, check to see if you dare tell the truth or

By observer