Con't from May's Council Meeting

Posted in: Village Of Valleyview

Mr. Parrish stated I made under the table deals.
I asked what they were. He said, ''You know what they are.'' I said, You did not answer my question.'' He said that he did.

He still has not said what I did.

I have stated I wanted Mark fired and some of the others. It was not done the right way. I told Raylene to get statements from the people who had complaints. She did not. He stated, ''I even cited where the information came from and encouraged anyone to look at those sources.'' If people had, they would not find that I ever did anything illegal OR under handed. I DID NOT approve paying for Mark's hearing. Mr. Parrish DID!! I complained to the state fraud division about the false insurance claim. Parrish BACKED Raylene. Who was really a friend to her?

I wrote a resolution to force re-payment of any monies taken from residents for ''underhanded deals''. Parrish REFUSED to approve or discuss it. LOOK at these records of council meetings. I was thrown out by Russolillo, Raylene and Watkins.

The ONLY individuals I wanted to hurt were the ones who had harmed the residents by taking their money illegally. That is why I was elected by the people.

I still resent and am offended by Parrish stating he backed Watkins because, ''he was the best person for the job.'' This is a slap in the face to any honest person running for office or not.

This kind of thinking is what's wrong with the world.

Watkins knows that I know about him. Check him out on the website. There is some things not on there. But he knows that I know what they are, why do you think he threatened me?

Parrish, you didn't get a PRIZE, you got a booby prize in Watkins.
  • Stock
  • parrishp
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 314 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor
You Would Not Believe The Truth

Ms. White I was not present to yours and others discussions as you spoke about getting back at people and firing people from their jobs simply because you personally did not like them.

You and the others wanted to hold someone to a standard that they were unaware that they had to meet. In the attempted firing of the Chief you went on TV and stated that there were specifics for the charges yet all you presented were generalizations without proof. Would you like to review the tape?

Ms. White wrote -
''I have stated I wanted Mark fired and some of the others. It was not done the right way. I told Raylene to get statements from the people who had complaints. She did not. He stated, 'I even cited where the information came from and encouraged anyone to look at those sources.' If people had, they would not find that I ever did anything illegal OR under handed. I DID NOT approve paying for Mark's hearing. Mr. Parrish DID!! I complained to the state fraud division about the false insurance claim. Parrish BACKED Raylene. Who was really a friend to her?''

I did not approve the paying of the bills from the hearing and discussed that at length with the auditors Again that is a false claim that you continue to make Ms. White. On the insurance fraud it was investigated and NO WRONG DOING was found. You refuse to accept the truth. I believe holding those responsible for what they did, not what you believe they did.

Ms. White wrote -
''I wrote a resolution to force re-payment of any monies taken from residents for 'underhanded deals'. Parrish REFUSED to approve or discuss it. LOOK at these records of council meetings. I was thrown out by Russolillo, Raylene and Watkins.''

I discussed and presented why I felt that the resolution was not correct. You only wanted to single out Raylene Graves when you were also at fault in my opinion. If the resolution had been written correctly and included you as among the people that had to make restitution to the Village I would have supported it, but to single out Ms. Graves while you avoid being held accountable would be wrong in my opinion.

Ms. White wrote -
''The ONLY individuals I wanted to hurt were the ones who had harmed the residents by taking their money illegally. That is why I was elected by the people.''

I do not for a minute believe that the residents of this Village elect anyone to hurt someone. I believe that you were elected to look into the matter and make things right which you failed to do because you were blinded by your hatred towards certain people. There was a better way to go about correcting the problems than the way that you tried and failed.

Ms. White wrote -
''I still resent and am offended by Parrish stating he backed Watkins because, 'he was the best person for the job.' This is a slap in the face to any honest person running for office or not.''

It would appear that the residents were also in agreement with me that Mayor Watkins was the best person for the job given the candidates that they had to choose from. Mayor Watkins received 66% of the vote, twice as many votes as you and Jack Morgan combined. I believe that speaks volumes about who the residents felt was the best person for the job.
Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_12477899-big-head.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow