Reason#10: Let's hope not
So far, this form of local government has created nothing but voter apathy. Let us hope that other communities seek to keep a participative government in their communities.
Your premise for appointed officials is questionable: of the professions I know without looking up: we have an insurance salesperson, a manufacturer's rep; someone on the chamber, a civil engineer, a loan officer, two retired people, and a business administrator; and other professions I cannot specifically name on the council; no where do I see interviewing experience and work history specific to a sheriff; an assessor, a coroner, a county recorder. Something is missing here. In elections these resumes are waived at the public; the public has more questions than 10 councilpersons and one mayor could ever think of; and the public would be involved in the choice of decision-makers in the county. Fortunately, I know there are citizens with direct experience in these decisions who could offer expertise and insight. Under this system; we will never hear their input.
Secondly, since there will be personal choice; specifically by George DiCero in naming some positions; how objective is this.
Thirdly, with the current self-appraisal the council has lauded upon themselves as being the most knowledgeable in community needs and business; therefore the most qualified to make decisions of any topic; how willingly will the council be to admit error?
Fourth; as far as our current Chief of Police' I personally have no trust in anyone who declares that "Human Cockfights" are entertainment; when I expect him to instruct his officers to arrest a person for abuse and assault when this type of fighting occurs in the street, a home, or a public place. Do I want Tom Deland to assume the role of Sheriff or whatever title is bestowed upon him as commander of our safety? NO.
By Br Anonymous