From the Associated Press:
A Philadelphia Appeals Court today will consider whether or not the baring of Janet Jackson's breast at the halftime show of the 2004 Superbowl was an ''indecent act'' or merely a ''wardrobe malfunction''. CBS has been fined $550,000.00 already, and is considering taking this to the Supreme Court.
I cannot believe, with all the problems facing this country, that nearly 4 years later, this is even an issue. Talk about a ridiculous waste of taxpayer money. Is there anyone out there that thinks this is still even newsworthy? How prudish are the people that are still up in arms about this? I mean, you see more nudity on anyone of the networks primetime dramas than was seen that split second at the Superbowl.
It would be a better use of taxpayers dollars if I sued the FCC and U.S. Gov't for a blatant ''misuse of taxpayers monies'' to pursue this retarded case.
Anyone else think this is just plain STUPID??!!!
A Philadelphia Appeals Court today will consider whether or not the baring of Janet Jackson's breast at the halftime show of the 2004 Superbowl was an ''indecent act'' or merely a ''wardrobe malfunction''. CBS has been fined $550,000.00 already, and is considering taking this to the Supreme Court.
I cannot believe, with all the problems facing this country, that nearly 4 years later, this is even an issue. Talk about a ridiculous waste of taxpayer money. Is there anyone out there that thinks this is still even newsworthy? How prudish are the people that are still up in arms about this? I mean, you see more nudity on anyone of the networks primetime dramas than was seen that split second at the Superbowl.
It would be a better use of taxpayers dollars if I sued the FCC and U.S. Gov't for a blatant ''misuse of taxpayers monies'' to pursue this retarded case.
Anyone else think this is just plain STUPID??!!!