Muscatine

Sir:

Based on hecklers's response to my previous letter, I believe it's safe to say that there's an insolent jackanape born every minute. It may help if I begin my discussion by relating an innocuous story in order to illustrate my point: A few days ago I was arguing with a particularly barbaric cretin who was insisting that everyone who doesn't share hecklers's beliefs is an oppressive, lackluster flake deserving of death and damnation. I tried to convince this baleful dork that hecklers's maudlin preoccupation with revanchism, usually sicklied over with such nonsense words as ''homeotransplantation'', would make sense if a person's honor were determined strictly by his or her ability to destroy the lives of good, honest people. As that's not the case, we can conclude only that it is not uncommon for hecklers to victimize the innocent, penalize the victim for making any effort to defend himself, and then paint the whole effete affair as some great benefit to humanity. I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that I frequently talk about how hecklers's hatchet jobs are way off base. I would drop the subject, except that the real question here is not, ''Why, in the name of all that is good and holy, does it want to destroy the values, methods, and goals of traditional humanistic study?''. The real question is rather, ''How can it be so Pecksniffian?'' I'll tell you the answer in a moment. But first, let me just say that if it makes fun of me or insults me, I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to discuss the advantages of two-parent families, the essential role of individual and family responsibility, the need for uniform standards of civil behavior, and the primacy of the work ethic. To conclude, hecklers is thoroughly unmovable by truth or reason.


Bedlam

Nedl?

I hate to ask you this, but, the last several posts that you have made, make me ask you what you are smoking, and, if you have any to share? What's going on? Did you and Cory hook up? Have a GREAT DAY, and remember, sharing is GOOD!

Oh I get it

just another innoculous cut and paste job.

Not much thought. Just someone else's words and opinions.

I didn't know you were the head of an adoption agency.

Sir (gag)-

Although the space allotted here can't possibly suffice to elaborate in detail on the long list of Mr. Hannitized's catty publications -- including the oligophrenic, the disgraceful, the self-deceiving, and especially the obstreperous -- I'll use what little space I have to detail the specific steps and objectives needed to thwart Hannitized's vindictive, hidebound schemes. One of my objectives is to raise the quality of debate on issues surrounding Hannitized's uncompromising claims. One could imagine that some good might come from letting Hannitized gain a respectable foothold for his caustic, evil actions. But the only one whose imagination is vivid enough is Hannitized. If you've ever watched television or read a book, odds are that you already know that many people respond to his adversarial paroxysms in the same way that they respond to television dramas. They watch them; they talk about them; but they feel no overwhelming compulsion to do anything about them. That's why I insist we educate the public on a range of issues. His henchmen all look like him, think like him, act like him, and alter laws, language, and customs in the service of regulating social relations, just like Hannitized does. And all this in the name of -- let me see if I can get their propaganda straight -- brotherhood and service. Ha! I close this post along the same lines it opened on: I am fed up with Mr. Hannitized's prodigal and clueless behavior.