Again
This letter is not intended to assuage your worst fears about liberals but will, in most cases, confirm them. To get right down to it, those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still think that I don't much care to share the same planet as liberals, have an obligation to do more than just observe what liberals is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to get people to sign a petition to limit liberals's ability to cause trouble. We have an obligation to reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community. And we have an obligation to think outside the box. If liberals has spurred us to carry out this matter to the full extent of the law, then liberals may have accomplished a useful thing. We have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we declare a truce with liberals and commence a dialogue, or is it sufficient to open minds instead of closing them? I apologize if this disappoints you but my intent was only to elucidate the question, not to answer it. I shall therefore state only that liberals ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. More fundamentally, if you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem.
A person with a functioning brain does not convince others that self-deceiving prigs are the ''chosen people'' of scriptural prophecy. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. Liberals might sue people at random before you know it. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? Liberals has warned us that faster than you can say ''hyperphosphorescence'', rude stumblebums will stir up trouble. If you think about it, you'll realize that liberals's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that we wouldn't currently have a problem with ruffianism if it weren't for liberals. Although it created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, liberals insists that it can solve the problem if we just grant it more power. How na?¯ve does it think we are? Truly, liberals will probably respond to this letter just like it responds to all criticism. It will put me down as ''sappy'' or ''sophomoric''. That's its standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about it except the most fawning praise. If you don't think that this is one letter that liberals doesn't want you to read, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. Liberals wants you to believe that no one is smart enough to see through its transparent lies. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by liberals's indecent agendas. I would like to close by saying that liberals's principles are dangerous to my health.
Turmoil
This letter is not intended to assuage your worst fears about liberals but will, in most cases, confirm them. To get right down to it, those of us who are still sane, those of us who still have a firm grip on reality, those of us who still think that I don't much care to share the same planet as liberals, have an obligation to do more than just observe what liberals is doing from a safe distance. We have an obligation to get people to sign a petition to limit liberals's ability to cause trouble. We have an obligation to reinvigorate our collective commitment to building and maintaining a sensitive, tolerant, and humane community. And we have an obligation to think outside the box. If liberals has spurred us to carry out this matter to the full extent of the law, then liberals may have accomplished a useful thing. We have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we declare a truce with liberals and commence a dialogue, or is it sufficient to open minds instead of closing them? I apologize if this disappoints you but my intent was only to elucidate the question, not to answer it. I shall therefore state only that liberals ignores the most basic ground rule of debate. In case you're not familiar with it, that rule is: attack the idea, not the person. More fundamentally, if you're not part of the solution, then you're part of the problem.
A person with a functioning brain does not convince others that self-deceiving prigs are the ''chosen people'' of scriptural prophecy. Sadly, lack of space prevents me from elaborating further. Liberals might sue people at random before you know it. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? Liberals has warned us that faster than you can say ''hyperphosphorescence'', rude stumblebums will stir up trouble. If you think about it, you'll realize that liberals's warning is a self-fulfilling prophecy in the sense that we wouldn't currently have a problem with ruffianism if it weren't for liberals. Although it created the problem, aggravated the problem, and escalated the problem, liberals insists that it can solve the problem if we just grant it more power. How na?¯ve does it think we are? Truly, liberals will probably respond to this letter just like it responds to all criticism. It will put me down as ''sappy'' or ''sophomoric''. That's its standard answer to everyone who says or writes anything about it except the most fawning praise. If you don't think that this is one letter that liberals doesn't want you to read, then you've missed the whole point of this letter. Liberals wants you to believe that no one is smart enough to see through its transparent lies. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by liberals's indecent agendas. I would like to close by saying that liberals's principles are dangerous to my health.
Turmoil
