Muscatine

A dose of reality

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

do hacked emails prove global warming a fraud

 

This morning, anonymous hackers released years worth of email messages from the prestigious British climate research center at the University of East Anglia. The emails appear to show scientists discussing how to manipulate climate data and suppress dissenting opinion, all in the interest of promoting their theory of human-caused climate change. East Anglia's Climate Research Unit, also known as Hadley CRU, has confirmed the authenticity of the emails.

A journalist at Australia's Herald Sun who acquired the documents says that all evidence points to a scandal of enormous magnitude:

So the 1079 emails and 72 documents seem indeed evidence of a scandal involving most of the most prominent scientists pushing the man-made warming theory - a scandal that is one of the greatest in modern science. I’ve been adding some of the most astonishing in updates below - emails suggesting conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organised resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more. If it is as it now seems, never again will “peer review” be used to shout down sceptics.

The London Telegraph has published some of the most damaging excerpts from the emails on its blog.

This is definitely a story to watch.

 

we are change confronts al gore at book signing!!!!

 

CHICAGO IL – On Tuesday, November 24th 2009, We Are Change Chicago attended a book signing with former vice president Al Gore, at the Borders Bookstore on 150 N. State Street.

The previous Thursday, news had begun to circulate that hacked documents and communications from the University of East Anglia’s Hadley Climate Research Unit (CRU) had been published to the internet. The information revealed how top scientists conspired to falsify data in the face of declining global temperatures in order to prop up the premise that man-made factors are driving climate change. Please review ClimateGate for Dummies.

To ensure the public that the media and Al Gore are aware of the facts that prove global warming to be a hoax, patriots from WAC Chicago marched to the book signing. Scattered throughout a crowd of a few hundred were members of WAC Chicago ready to ask Al Gore what he thought about ‘ClimateGate.’

First up was Saad Ali. As he approached Gore, he peacefully and respectably asked, “Sir, can you comment on the emails and documents that were hacked [ClimateGate] that reveal… that the research was a fraud and that it was all manipulated?” Gore, with an evil smirk, claimed that “he never read them.” By the look on his face and his stutter, it became quite clear that Gore was extremely uncomfortable with the question, so he quickly glared towards his security. The agents grabbed and assaulted Saad, escorting him away from Gore for merely asking a simple question. The press took notice and started filming and snapping pictures of what was going on. One of which appeared the next day in the Chicago Sun Times.

Al Gore confronted on ClimateGate in Chicago  Saad Sun times4 258x300 We Are Change Chicago at the Al Gore book signing.

Following Saad’s confrontation, Sati Word, a member of WAC Chicago, questioned Gore on why the IPCC hasn’t released any reports on sunspot activity. However, before he could get an answer from Gore, security grabbed Sati and escorted him out of the building.

A little while later, Anthony, an activist from We Are Change Ohio, approached Gore and handed him the petition of the 31,486 scientists who say that Global Warming is a complete hoax. Anthony asked, “What do you think about the science behind this sir?” Mr. Gore rolled his eyes, and security escorted him out of the building.

Steve (swizzlesteve), was the last activist to question Gore. Within seconds of asking, “Any comments on ClimateGate? The emails that prove it’s a scam, a farce, that global warming is a joke, any comment?” Mr. Gore is heard to utter a few “uhhhhhhhs” and security quickly steps in to remove him as well.

The press was waiting outside Borders. They wanted to find out who this group was, that dared question what the elite had forced us to consume as truth. WBBM news radio, 780, ran a sound bite of WAC Chicago, WGN news ran footage, Medill Reports wrote an article, and blog posts were popping up all over the internet about the Al Gore confrontation in Chicago. Many also asked about the footage of WAC Chicago chasing after Gore’s SUV after the event. You will find all of it in this video. Al Gore was confronted multiple times in line, outside the event as he rushed to his waiting Mercedes SUV, (were you expecting something electric?), and once again in the streets of Chicago. We Are Change had people outside with signs, banners, fliers, and DVDs.  Activists were inside asking questions and demanding answers; the world is waking up, it’s a great time to be alive.

the video from wac

 

 

 

we are change youtube channel

 

weather channel founder: warming the greatest scam in history!!!!

 

global warming petition project: 31,487 American scientist with 9,029 PHD's

 

 

 

 

 

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Probably more rational than Whoopie Goldberg and Brad Pitt, some of the people that sign your petitions.

 

I have no petitions.

 

I am impressed enough to decide that I will not support knee jerk taxes, power grabs, and rain making scams promolgated by the left wing fools you follow.

 

  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Qualifications of Signers

Signatories are approved for inclusion in the Petition Project list if they have obtained formal educational degrees at the level of Bachelor of Science or higher in appropriate scientific fields. The petition has been circulated only in the United States.

The current list of petition signers includes 9,029 PhD; 7,157 MS; 2,586 MD and DVM; and 12,715 BS or equivalent academic degrees. Most of the MD and DVM signers also have underlying degrees in basic science.

All of the listed signers have formal educations in fields of specialization that suitably qualify them to evaluate the research data related to the petition statement. Many of the signers currently work in climatological, meteorological, atmospheric, environmental, geophysical, astronomical, and biological fields directly involved in the climate change controversy.

The Petition Project classifies petition signers on the basis of their formal academic training, as summarized below. Scientists often pursue specialized fields of endeavor that are different from their formal education, but their underlying training can be applied to any scientific field in which they become interested.

Outlined below are the numbers of Petition Project signatories, subdivided by educational specialties. These have been combined, as indicated, into seven categories.

1. Atmospheric, environmental, and Earth sciences includes 3,805 scientists trained in specialties directly related to the physical environment of the Earth and the past and current phenomena that affect that environment.

2. Computer and mathematical sciences includes 935 scientists trained in computer and mathematical methods. Since the human-caused global warming hypothesis rests entirely upon mathematical computer projections and not upon experimental observations, these sciences are especially important in evaluating this hypothesis.

3. Physics and aerospace sciences include 5,812 scientists trained in the fundamental physical and molecular properties of gases, liquids, and solids, which are essential to understanding the physical properties of the atmosphere and Earth.

4. Chemistry includes 4,822 scientists trained in the molecular interactions and behaviors of the substances of which the atmosphere and Earth are composed.

5. Biology and agriculture includes 2,965 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of living things on the Earth.

6. Medicine includes 3,046 scientists trained in the functional and environmental requirements of human beings on the Earth.

7. Engineering and general science includes 10,102 scientists trained primarily in the many engineering specialties required to maintain modern civilization and the prosperity required for all human actions, including environmental programs.

The following outline gives a more detailed analysis of the signers' educations.

Atmosphere, Earth, & Environment (3,805)

1. Atmosphere (579)

I) Atmospheric Science (112)
II) Climatology (39)
III) Meteorology (343)
IV) Astronomy (59)
V) Astrophysics (26)

2. Earth (2,240)

I) Earth Science (94)
II) Geochemistry (63)
III) Geology (1,684)
IV) Geophysics (341)
V) Geoscience (36)
VI) Hydrology (22)

3. Environment (986)

I) Environmental Engineering (487)
II) Environmental Science (253)
III) Forestry (163)
IV) Oceanography (83)

Computers & Math (935)

1. Computer Science (242)

2. Math (693)

I) Mathematics (581)
II) Statistics (112)

Physics & Aerospace (5,812)

1. Physics (5,225)

I) Physics (2,365)
II) Nuclear Engineering (223)
III) Mechanical Engineering (2,637)

2. Aerospace Engineering (587)

Chemistry (4,822)

1. Chemistry (3,129)

2. Chemical Engineering (1,693)

Biochemistry, Biology, & Agriculture (2,965)

1. Biochemistry (744)

I) Biochemistry (676)
II) Biophysics (68)

2. Biology (1,438)

I) Biology (1,049)
II) Ecology (76)
III) Entomology (59)
IV) Zoology (149)
V) Animal Science (105)

3. Agriculture (783)

I) Agricultural Science (296)
II) Agricultural Engineering (114)
III) Plant Science (292)
IV) Food Science (81)

Medicine (3,046)

1. Medical Science (719)

2. Medicine (2,327)

General Engineering & General Science (10,102)

1. General Engineering (9,833)

I) Engineering (7,280)
II) Electrical Engineering (2,169)
III) Metallurgy (384)

2. General Science (269)

 

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

sea ice amounts from 1979

 

Alleged NASA 1979 image of Arctic "Sea Ice".

 

sea ice amounts from 2003

 

Alleged NASA 2003 comparative image of Arctic "Sea Ice".

 

NASA website for above images/report:  http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2003/1023esuice.html

 

Questions for Mallcontent:

1. How do photos of the Earth from 1979 and 2003 look exactly the same?

 

They don't look exactly the same.   One has more ice and snow cover.    They look the same with the exception of ice and snow cover because the satellite camera that took them was in very nearly the same point in space, relative to the earth, both times.

 

2. How does NASA's cameras from space differentiate between sea ice and land ice.

 

I don't think they do.  Read answer to question 3.

 

 

(Noting that the northern-most Yukon territory, Nova Scotia, and northern Russia, along with northern Canada are never without ice/snow/glaciers all year round.)

 

Yukon, and northern Russia do experience times with nearly no snow on the ground as well as does much of northern Canada.   There are no glaciers on the north coast of Russia.   The largest glaciers in Russia are on the southern border with Georgia.   The eastern arctic islands are the exceptions.

Nova Scotia is at approximately the same latitude as Minnesota and has the same dearth of glaciers.

 

3.How do the NASA cameras know "sea ice" from "land ice" and "glaciers";

 

The cameras don't know anything.   They show all snow and all ice.   The people looking at the pictures have to know what is on land and what is on sea.

 

and why are there none shown that we know exist year-round; especially on mountian tops? 

 

They are visible when they are in the pictured area.

One of the pictures you chose not to show , clearly shows the glaciers in southern Alaska and on the Russian island of Novaya Zemlya and Iceland.   There are no others of significance in the pictured area except all those on Greenland and the eastern Canadian islands.

 

Now; see below, from NASA's website:

The composite animation showing the sea ice over a star field background with dates.

 

Dated March 06, 2010; this photo shows enormous ice all over the land and all over the seas in the Arctic. One can even see the Great Lakes and Alaska for reference.

1. Mallcontent; How can polar-ice/sea-ice be shrinking annually by 9% if NASA's own photos show more ice (land-included) in 2010 than in 1979 and 2003?

 

I shouldn't have to tell this  but the picture with the most snow and ice is dated March 06.   It's probably after a late snowfall.

 

The others are clearly identfied as the ice cover at its minimum.   Probably in the fall.

 

2. How does any camera differentiate between snow and ice; especially from space?

 

See answer above.

 

Website: http://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/vis/a000000/a003600/a003698/index.html

 

Let's see you argue for the flaws NASA has presented in their own glabal-warming websites and "alleged satellite photos"! Good luck...

 

 


I left out the dozen ugly names I could have called you.   Appreciate it.

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_12477899-big-head.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow