here are the founders of that website you posted

Founders & members:

• M. A. Khan (USA, Editor)

• Abul Kasem (Australia)

• Dr. Ali Sina (USA)

• M. A. Hussain (Australia)

• Sher Khan (USA)

• Syed Kamran Mirza (USA)

• Mumin Salih (UK)

 

“Abul Kasem is no better than Doctors"

 

 

By

Suhail Khalid

 

            This is in response to Abul Kasem’s Article “Westerners find $cience in the Quran” which is posted on Ali Sina’s website. Readers! You can find Abul Kasem’s Article over here:

 

http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/abulkazem/science_in_quran.htm

 

          Readers! At the outset of Abul Kasem’s article, Ali Sina wrote that this article was published in the “News from Bangladesh” on April 18, 2001. I took a crack at exploring this precise article on newspaper’s website and in their archives as well, but “unsurprisingly” couldn’t find it (http://www.bangladesh-web.com/news/). I even wrote to the editor; however never received a reply from him as well. Allah knows better if this particular article ever published in any newspaper. Knowing Ali Sina and his fibs, it is again very grueling for me to have faith in this fable as well.

 

          Readers! Please do read the article by Abul Kasem. It is hilarious indeed. The author appeared to be so belligerent in faceting “Dr. Maurice Bucaille’s” & “Dr. Keith Moore’s” life histories. Bestowing the inkling that he was in the company of the Doctors all the time and nothing down all the things they were doing. Surprisingly, he is also aware of the “HIDDEN STORY” that King Faisal of Saudi Arabia had bribed Doctors to inscribe their books. He & his ally Ali Sina imagine that populace will believe every word from them by “NO EVIDENCE” in hand again. I would like both Abul Kasem and Ali Sina to enlighten me from where do they dig up these kinds of “INSIDE STORIES”. link

 

DR ALI SINA EXPOSED

From: Truth teller
Date: 01 Mar 2001
Time: 11:32:08
Remote Name: 195.92.67.71

Comments

Dr Ali Sina is a fraud! - he is an iranian right and therefore a shia - why then is he quoting from SUNNI hadith books like Bukhari and Abu Dawud which Shia utterly reject as false!! - if he grew up in iran as he claims or was taught islam by shia he never would have been taught from these books - they are not available- why doesnt he quote from Al-Kafi or shia hadith books/texts??? - he takes from a translation of the quran by a wahaabi Dr Muhsin Khan - no shia would do this -wahabbi hate shia and think they are kafir!!! - the translations of bukhari and muhsin khan quran are readily available in the west - so what this kaffir has done is read them and then pretend to be a muslim - but he gets it completely wrong!!!

When he says "I could not believe what i read in bukhari" he is correct - since no shia believes what is in bukhari is correct!!!

He narrates hadith from people who shias consider to be untrusthworthy like Aisha - so how can this be a true hadith?? Also many of the hadith in Bukhari and Abu Dawud are considered weak by many later SUNNI scholars!! - how does he know he is not quoting a weak or forged hadith?????

He narrates hadith from Umar!! - Shias HATE and curse Umar - he quotes hadith from Abu Huraira - shiites reject ALL his hadith - he was a supporter of Muawiya!! link

 

Another Fake Ex-Muslim? You Decide

According to the person running the  youtube page promoting Zaki Ameen and his books on Islam, Zaki Ameen is a former Muslim Imam, who has left Islam and has decided to educate us Muslims and non-Muslims about the evils of the religion of Islam. A religion whose book and everything else was fabricated by the Prophet(as), not divinely revealed, according to him. link

 

Other interpretations of "Jihad":

Both the Judeo-Christian Holy Bible and the Muslim Holy Qur'an are large religious books, containing a great range of material dealing with religion, spirituality, justice, laws, love, etc. And they also contain references to violence, hate, murder, war, and even genocide.

It would be quite possible to assemble passages from the Bible -- particularly the Hebrew Scriptures (a.k.a. Old Testament) which describe genocide, rape, execution of non-virgin brides, murder of homosexuals, torture of prisoners, the rape of female prisoners of war, murder of a family because of the act of the father, the regulation and condoning of human slavery, and many other acts, cultural traditions, and laws which are profoundly immoral by today's religious and secular standards. If all one read of the Bible was a collection of such passages, one might conclude that the Bible is an evil document that promotes violence, unethical behavior. One might even conclude that it should be banned as hate literature.

Similarly, it is possible to scan the Bible for passages relating to humans' love of God; love of humans by God; striving for justice; supporting widows, orphans, the sick, the imprisoned; love and concern for fellow humans; spirituality; and may other acts, cultural traditions, and laws which promote a loving, moral and ethical life. If all one read of the Bible was a collection of such passages, one might conclude that the Bible is a precious document indeed -- one worthy of emulating.

Which group of passages represent the real Bible? They both do! For centuries, Christians have searched for guidance on social conflicts like the abolition of human slavery, equal rights and opportunities for women, equal rights and protections for gays and lesbians, etc. Some search for specific passages in the Bible dealing with these issues. A few concluded that slavery is an acceptable institution, that women should be oppressed and denied rights, and that gays (and perhaps lesbians as well) should be executed. Others search for passages dealing with general themes, such as love, justice, and caring for ones fellow humans, and concluded the opposite. Others have used other techniques to assess the Bible's messages. Which represents the "true" message of the Bible? They both do. And this is the reason why there are over 1,000 Christian groups in North America, all basing their beliefs and practices on the Bible, and yet teaching conflicting many beliefs about deity, humanity and the rest of the universe.

The Qur'an is similar.

A small percentage of Muslims who are from the extreme, radical and violent wing of Islamic Fundamentalism, and who are "...passionate, [deeply] religious and anti-Western..." 5 might dwell on passages or verses dealing with conflict, war, and resistance to oppression. Many conclude that the Qur'an expects them to engage in acts of terrorism, assassinations, suicide bombings, armed aggression against persons of other religions, oppression of women, executing innocent persons, etc.

Those Muslim Fundamentalists who are not extreme, violent and radical, and those Muslims from mainline or liberal wings of the religion might concentrate on passages and themes of spirituality, justice, personal struggle, peace, freedom, etc.

They are consulting the same book, with a different emphasis, and achieve very different results.

We see the same split among Christians as they study Islam and the Qur'an.

	Some emphasize the earlier passages in the Qur'an which emphasize cooperation with the Jews and Christians -- the "People of the Book." They tend to interpret "Jihad" in terms of personal struggle towards purity.
	Others emphasize later passages of the Qur'an which were received during a time of conflict. They tend to interpret "Jihad" as holy war.

They come to opposite conclusions about whether Islam is a religion of peace or war.  link

 

crusades the truth

 

Inquisitions

roman Inquisition jewish virtual library

salem witchcraft trials of 1692

American indian holocaust

 

we are losing our nation to lies about the necessities of war

 

Does Iran's President Want Israel Wiped Off The Map - Does He Deny The Holocaust?

 

It's becoming clear. The statements of the Iranian President have been reflected by the media in a manipulated way. Iran's President betokens the removal of the regimes, that are in power in Israel and in the USA, to be possible aim for the future. This is correct. But he never demands the elimination or annihilation of Israel. He reveals that changes are potential. The Shah-Regime being supported by the USA in its own country has been vanquished. The eastern governance of the Soviet Union collapsed. Saddam Hussein's dominion drew to a close. Referring to this he voices his aspiration that changes will also be feasible in Israel respectively in Palestine. He adduces Ayatollah Khomeini referring to the Shah-Regime who in this context said that the regime (meaning the Shah-Regime) should be removed. link

the CIA coup in Iran

 

The United States government has been involved in and assisted in the overthrow of foreign governments (more recently termed regime change) without the overt use of U.S. military force. Often, such operations are tasked to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). Many of the governments targeted by the U.S. have been democratically elected, rather than authoritarian governments or military dictatorships. In many cases, the governments toppled were replaced by dictatorships, sometimes installed with assistance by the U.S.

 

 Our government is an out of control corporate empire bent on domination of world resources. That is why we are at war with Iraq, Afghanistan and libya. Stop believing the lies of the neo-cons spread by corporate media. check out these CIA black ops-coup of iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, democratic republic of congo 1960, Iraq 1963, brazil 1964, republic of ghana 1966, Iraq 1968, afghanistan 1973-74, Iraq 1973 -75, argentina 1976, Afghanistan 1979-80, Iran 1980, Nicaragua 1981-90, Philippines 1986 and haiti 2004.

   In the April 2008 the journalist David Rose suggested that the United States collaborated with the Palestinian Authority and Israel to attempt a coup on Hamas, and Hamas pre-empted the coup.Hamas Foreign Minister Dr. Mahmoud al-Zahar has echoed this view, and called the arming of Fatah by the United States an "American coup d'état".Hamas is listed as a terrorist organization by many Western nations.

 

finally what is this about! the fez is red because it is a symbol of mahammod dipping his hat in the blood of christians look it up!!!---- BE A SHRINER NOW

 

 

If you still need help or would like a local contact,

Call Temple Office  920-4107
 

Petition in Acrobat pdf format

 

Membership Qualifications

 

   Freemasons operate many of the world's greatest charitable organizations. The best known is the Shriners with their circuses, their colorful parades and their work on behalf of physically challenged children and the 22 Shriners Childrens Hospitals. Less known is that each Shriner must be a Freemason before being becoming a Shriner.

 

   Once accepted as an Apprentice Mason of the Craft Lodge, each member works his way up through three degrees. To earn each degree, a Mason must learn certain lessons and participate in a ceremony that illustrates them. At the third degree, he reaches Master Mason after which he may then petition to become a Noble of the Shrine.

Masonic Grand Lodge of California

   Members of the Shrine for North America adhere to the principles of Freemasonry — brotherly love, relief and truth. In contrast to the more conservative work of Freemasonry, Shriners are distinguished by an enjoyment of life in the interest of philanthropy. Their buoyant philosophy has been described as "pleasure without intemperance, hospitality without rudeness and jollity without coarseness." 
 

 

 

Why Do Shriners Wear a Fez?
 

   The red fez with a black tassel, the Shrine's most distinctive symbol, has been handed down through the ages. It derives its name from the place where it was first manufactured - the holy city of Fez, Morocco. The fez was chosen as part of the Shrine's Arabic (Near East) theme, around which the color and pageantry of the Shrine are developed.
 

 

 

 

 

 

What is a Shrine Mason?

   Shriners, or Shrine Masons, belong to the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine for North America (A.A.O.N.M.S.). The Shrine is an international fraternity of approximately 500,000 members who belong to Shrine Center throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico, and The Republic of Panama. Founded in New York City in 1872 the organization is composed Master Masons.

The Shrine is best-known for its colorful parades, its distinctive red fez, and its official philanthropy, Shriners Hospitals for Children, which is often called "the heart and soul of the Shrine." Principles of Freemasonry -- Brotherly Love, Relief and Truth.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   Members of the Ancient Arabic Order Nobles of the Mystic Shrine for North America are members of the Masonic Order and adhere to the principles of Freemasonry -- Brotherly Love, Relief and Truth.

Freemasonry dates back hundreds of years to when stonemasons and other craftsmen on building projects gathered in shelter houses or lodges. Through the years these gatherings changed in many ways until formal Masonic lodges emerged, with members bound together not by trade, but by their own wishes to be fraternal brothers. There is no higher degree in Freemasonry than that of Master Mason (the Third Degree).