Muscatine

This film should be viewed as a whole body of work, as it is NOT about the life, career or CREDIBILTY of any one perticular Hollywood Celebrity.

Celebrities do have the right to FREEDOM OF SPEECH and are free to verbally express their own opinion (so long as it doesn't cause personal injury to others). If I wanted RESPECTABILTY, I would have made a boring film about the dozen or so ACADEMICALLY ACCREDITED scientests who have actually tested the World Trade Center dust and found UN-EXPLODED military grade NANO-THERMITE.

This film is about Hollywood's GUT FEELING that something is just not right, and the dozens of UNANSWERED QUESTIONS they have.

9/11 truth: hollywood speaks out

watch as famous people, charlie sheen, martin sheen, sharon stone, geraldo rivera, joe rogan, rosie O, ed asner, john schneider, daniel sunjata, jim coor, david lynch(film producer/director), hal sparks, mark ruffalo, jessie ventura, willie nelson, prodigy, esai morales and more talk about 9/11

Mr mobaydave

Things like this require a long response with so much to take in and reply to it all. My sausage fingers would get too tired while my typing errors would mount, so I'll try to be short. I watched this I was amazed and mystified and well gosh, just a mountain of doubts and subjectivity. I think objectivity should be applied here. Setting aside any beliefe in reality making anything possible, and out of all this seems some order from chaos. I cannot do that. But I must admit there are some questions that are unanswered or unanswerable. Building7 as aposed to 4-5 and 6. Pulled and what not. The pentagon and the miniscule hole size and vertually no wreckage to ascertain the identity of the 757. no black boxes and so on. But in reality, if  it wasn't the plane said to have hit the pentagon, where in the name of our Lord did the plane go and all the people that was said to have done it?  I say IF the drone plane or what ever that hit the pentagon were nothing else, then why were there no other witnesses to attest to that. A plane was clearly identified by those on the road as it flew over. The nearly perfect freefall without any controlled explosives seems impossible regarding number 7, one and two also, but there it is, that disbelief in all reality. Those buildings closer were much smaller and though they didn't implode and fall, looked to be more heavily damaged otherwise. A compelling argument true. But all in all it would have taken months to more than a year*says engineer granson in-law* to orchestrate such an elaborate plane to destroy so completely that much realestate in a huge city as New York without anyone knowing publicly what they were up to. Thw sheer immensity of that kind of operation just couldn't go unnoticed. I have never enjoyed a minute of the bush years nor the man, but you'd have to be a complete loony to think that in 8 months he orchestrated the greatest terrorist disaster on US soil all to gain support of two wars that never should have been waged in the first place.  No, I think he did however use the tragedy to gain momentum of that idea which is almost as bad as actually pulling off the attack. Poor Hoover got the blame for the economic collapse of the world in less time. Not possible for any man in a few years much less 8 months. No that would take 8 years to destroy the global economy. The rest IS HISTORY as they say.

Enough of that....Let's talk about something really serious (but sickening):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mG4gKPGHNq8

Most of us have experienced this devious trick, but I suspect few of us recognized it for what it really was.  Now the consipriacy has been divulged.  And protests will be sweeping the U.K. (first).