Muscatine

The opposing discussion is more like Sir Winston Churchill and the British Prime Minister planning what turned out to be the battle of Gallipoli.  Or maybe Custer planning retaliation against the Indians.

Napolean invading Russia?   Bush invading Iraq.

Pretty weak copycat response.  Don't be so lazy.

"...their admitted efforts", brightboy? Saddam claimed not only to be obtaining; but to having WMD's. So, explain the difference. It must be a conflict of your choosing. So, based on your offering, little davieboy, to assume Saddam didn't have it/them is foolish? You have no greater intell on Iran. (admitted efforts----what were Saddam's admitted efforts?) They were all over the place at the time.....but it wasn't good enough for you commie libs. Remember that whole list I posted , of Libs and Dem gov't officials that stated Saddam was the risk and had WMD's. Shall I post those quotes again? It simply proves "their admitted efforts"......and that is all you offer on Iran! Open for discussion.....

The difference is we knew Saddam didn't have them. Bush and his aministration lied. They tortured people to make claims that simply were not true. Hence why there is now a push by Amnesty International to have Bush arrested during his trip to Canada. In case you need a link.

http://news.yahoo.com/amnesty-calls-canada-arrest-bush-153453369.html

See the difference....