New Hampshire GOP primary debate (Transcript)
ROMNEY: George, this is an unusual topic that you're raising. States have a right to ban contraception? I can't imagine a state banning contraception. I can't imagine the circumstances where a state would want to do so, and if I were a governor of a state or...
STEPHANOPOULOS: Well, the Supreme Court has ruled --
(CROSSTALK)
ROMNEY: ... or a -- or a legislature of a state -- I would totally and completely oppose any effort to ban contraception. So you're asking -- given the fact that there's no state that wants to do so, and I don't know of any candidate that wants to do so, you're asking could it constitutionally be done? We can ask our constitutionalist here.
(LAUGHTER)

(CROSSTALK)

STEPHANOPOULOS: I'm sure Congressman Paul...
(CROSSTALK)
ROMNEY: OK, come on -- come on back...
STEPHANOPOULOS: ... asking you, do you believe that states have that right or not?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gOq3O8g1xw4

Ron Paul was on FIRE at this debate hosted by ABC News.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XsvGxKQPSNU&sns

Kelly Clarkson Tweets “I Love Ron Paul,” Digital Sales Increase by 232%

WAR IS PEACE FREEDOM IS SLAVERY IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH MITT ROMNEY IS A CONSERVATIVE

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, run neck-and-neck with President Obama in a general-election matchup, according to a new CBS News poll released late on Monday that shows the two front-runners in Tuesday's New Hampshire GOP primary running stronger against the president than their fellow Republicans.

Romney posts a two-point lead over Obama, 47 percent to 45 percent, within the poll's margin of error of plus or minus 2.8 percentage points. He leads Obama, 45 percent to 39 percent, among independent voters.

Obama's lead over Paul is just one point, 46 percent to 45 percent, as Paul leads among independents by 7 points.

The president posts more significant leads over the other GOP candidates, but against each he is below the critical 50-percent threshold: He leads former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, 49 percent to 41 percent; former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, 48 percent to 41 percent; Texas Gov. Rick Perry, 49 percent to 42 percent; and former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., 47 percent to 43 percent.

Among all adults, just 45 percent of Americans approve of the job Obama is doing as president, slightly worse than the 47-percent approval rating he posted last month. Among independents, 38 percent approve of Obama's job performance, while 49 percent disapprove.

Results released earlier Monday among Republicans who said they intend to vote in their state's presidential nominating contest showed Romney running slightly ahead of the rest of the field, but nearly a third of Republicans are undecided or seeking a candidate not currently in the race.

Don't be conned into nominating Mitt Romney!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vS9SF3vc-A

Former Governor: Incident "never happened...someone is out to destroy my credibility"

Paul Joseph Watson
http://www.infowars.com/
http://www.prisonplanet.tv/
Saturday, January 7, 2012

Following claims made by US Navy SEAL Chris Kyle that he punched Jesse Ventura for badmouthing US troops during a wake for a slain soldier in Coronado, California, Ventura has denounced the story as an outrageous lie, asserting that the event never happened.


Kyle, who has been the subject of numerous television interviews over the past few days while he promotes his new book, is a sniper marksmen who has been made into somewhat of a poster child for US military involvement in the Middle East following his tales of killing hundreds of Iraqi insurgents.

Kyle claims that he met Ventura in a bar in Coronado in 2006 while Ventura was in town to speak to a new class of SEAL graduates at nearby Naval Amphibious Base Coronado. Also present were family members holding a wake for Michael Mansoor, one of the first SEALs killed in Iraq. Kyle claims Ventura began loudly objecting to the war in Iraq before calling the troops "murderers" and saying "we deserved to lose a few guys".

Kyle then claims he punched Ventura, knocked him to the floor, and quickly ran away.

Infowars today spoke with Tyrel Ventura, Jesse Ventura's son, who related to us how Ventura is shocked, heartbroken and saddened about how a fellow Navy SEAL could invent such a hurtful and abhorrent lie.

The event never happened, Ventura has never met Kyle, and the whole story is a transparent hoax seemingly designed as an attempt at character assassination given Ventura's very public recent battles with the federal government, in particular his fight with the TSA, and his vehement anti-war stance, Tyrel told us after talking with his father.

Ventura explained that he has only ever visited the bar in question with groups of friends, and the notion that the story if true would not have already become public in the space of over five years is plainly ludicrous.

Ventura labels the story a total fabrication and is beyond heartbroken that a fellow service member and Navy SEAL would invent such outrageous lies designed to defame him and help sell a book. He adds that it is incredibly vicious to claim at a wake he would insult the family members of a slain soldier, which is one of the worst slurs that could be made against anybody, not to mention a former Navy SEAL like Ventura.

In his Facebook response, Ventura makes reference to another false claim that had to be retracted about him supposedly tail gating in California last week, suggesting that there is an organized effort to "destroy my credibility".

Such actions may be an effort to pre-empt the possibility that Ventura could enter the presidential picture as a candidate for the Libertarian Party. Tyrel Ventura told us that Jesse is completely blown away that the establishment is now coming after him by way of manufactured hoaxes and cynical acts of character assassination in a bid to politically discredit him.
http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-jesse-ventura-blasts-navy-seal-punch-hoax/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vcN0XITFjmw

Google "isolationism vs. non interventionism" and ask your friends to do the same.

RAND PAUL vs ESTABLISHMENT PRESSTITUTES

http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/singlehtml.htm

we are change mitt romney questioned on the fed and goldman sachs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ulPMQ-0fFZE

Ron Paul Campaign Uses Soros-funded Research

Rick Santorum told Ron Paul in Saturday’s debate: “You should know better than to cite George Soros-like organizations.” The comment came in response to attacks on Santorum’s record from the Texas Congressman and libertarian running in the Republican presidential primaries.

Exposed for using Soros-funded research in an attack ad charging that Santorum had been “one of the most corrupt” members of Congress, Paul had no explanation or response, except to say that “somebody” had done a survey attacking Santorum and he used it in the ad. The Ron Paul ad includes the line, “I’m Ron Paul and I approve this message.”

The exchange adds to Republican fears that Paul is trying to weaken or divide Republicans in order to guarantee Obama’s re-election.

The Soros organization alluded to by Santorum is the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). It is the source of the corruption charge against Santorum in the Ron Paul ad.

In the debate, Paul said that “…somebody did make a survey and I think he came out as one of the top corrupt individuals because he took so much money from the lobbyists.”

That “somebody” was CREW, a Soros-funded group that targets Republicans and conservatives.

Santorum shot back: “Let’s talk about the corruption issue. The person who—the group that called me corrupt was a group called CREW. If you haven’t been sued by CREW, you’re not a conservative. CREW is this left-wing organization that puts out a list every election of the top Republicans who have tough races and calls them all corrupt because they take contributions from PACs. It’s a ridiculous charge. And you should know better than to cite George Soros-like organizations to say that they’re corrupt.”

Former Republican Senate candidate Christine O’Donnell was the subject of a false complaint from CREW, which was dismissed in July of this year. O’Donnell reacted by saying, “We are, of course, very pleased that the U.S. Attorney’s office has finally seen through the bogus CREW complaint and concluded it is without merit, because there was never any evidence to support their allegations. CREW interjected itself into the campaign within hours of my winning the Delaware GOP primary, even though CREW had no actual basis for its complaint. Even more troubling is that CREW, as a 501(c)(3) organization, is prohibited by law from intervening in political campaigns—but they more than intervened in the campaign, doing everything they could possibly do to sabotage my election.”

As a result, O’Donnell’s group, ChristinePAC, has asked the IRS to strip CREW of its tax exempt status for engaging in partisan political activities in violation of federal law. O’Donnell’s PAC has also released a video exposing CREW’S “illegal, partisan agenda” and highlighting Soros’s funding of the group. The video includes excerpts of an interview with CREW executive director Melanie Sloan talking about how the Soros-funded Open Society Institute (OSI) is “a very big donor” and that the OSI is “very happy with what we do.”

Another website devoted to exposing CREW says, “An analysis of CREW’s ‘watchdog’ activities reveals a systematic effort to disproportionately target Republicans and conservative-leaning groups with often-frivolous lawsuits, ethics complaints, and petitions for investigations by law enforcement agencies. An analysis of CREW’s activities demonstrates that it disproportionately targets conservatives by a ratio of more than 8-to-1. At the same time, the corresponding federal oversight agencies responsible for investigating CREW’s complaints indicates that, historically, Democrats have been investigated far more often for ethics violations.”

A Washington Times column by Robert Knight, “Time to disarm partisan CREW,” noted, “Like the American Civil Liberties Union, CREW occasionally goes after Democrats, if only to maintain a facade of nonpartisanship. For instance, CREW targeted disgraced New York Rep. Charles B. Rangel and Louisiana Rep. William ‘Cold Cash’ Jefferson, who hid $90,000 in his freezer. Its current list of ‘most corrupt’ members of Congress includes 10 Democrats in addition to 15 Republicans, up from just three Democrats and 17 Republicans in 2006. But overall, most of CREW’s bullets are fired at conservatives and Republicans.”

CREW went after Santorum years ago but its current Republican target is former House Speaker and Republican presidential candidate Newt Gingrich. A review of its current news releases shows two attacking Gingrich and one highlighting Rupert Murdoch, owner of News Corporation, parent of Fox News, as “scoundrel of the year.”

Perhaps this has something to do with Fox News running a story on CREW’s frivolous complaints against Republicans.

http://www.aim.org/aim-column/ron-paul-campaign-uses-soros-funded-research/

So what about his wonderful record in Congress 1 for 620? He's sure a leader isn't he? But I've got to give him that he sure can talk - nonstop for days it seems. Must be why mobay likes him so much. BTW - that one bill that he sponsored and it passed was nothing of substance - some bill to sell something in Texas, certainly nothing to change/improve the way the govt runs like he talks about all the time.

here is a list of his bills so blame a guy for the bills corporate politicians have not allowed to pass. why not look at the bills and ask why they have not been passed! by the way put up your guys record I'll bet they have a corporate bill track record!!! BTW answer the question jus WHERE ARE WE GOING TO GET THE MONEY TO START A WAR WITH iRAN????

A LIST

	Bill	Status	Last Action
	H.R. 1495: Gold Reserve Transparency Act of 2011	Introduced	Apr 12, 2011
	H.R. 1496: Federal Reserve Transparency Act	Introduced	Apr 12, 2011
	H.R. 1830: To authorize the interstate traffic of unpasteurized milk and milk products that are packaged for direct human consumption.	Introduced	May 11, 2011
	H.R. 1271: Agriculture Education Freedom Act	Introduced	Mar 30, 2011
	H.R. 1139: Tax Free Tips Act of 2011	Introduced	Mar 16, 2011
	H.R. 1146: American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2009	Introduced	Mar 17, 2011
	H.R. 1201: Thrift Savings Fund Improvement Act	Introduced	Mar 17, 2011
	H.R. 1831: Industrial Hemp Farming Act of 2011	Introduced	May 11, 2011
	H.R. 2263: Unemployed Tax Relief Act of 2011	Introduced	Jun 21, 2011
	H.R. 2438: American Traveller Dignity Act of 2011	Introduced	Jul 7, 2011
	H.R. 2613: Citizens Protection Act of 2011	Introduced	Jul 21, 2011
	H.R. 2262: Unemployment Assistance Act of 2011	Introduced	Jun 21, 2011
	H.R. 2044: Health Freedom Act	Introduced	May 26, 2011
	H.R. 2045: Freedom of Health Speech Act	Introduced	May 26, 2011
	H.R. 2080: Evacuees Tax Relief Act of 2011	Introduced	Jun 1, 2011
	H.R. 151: Seniors' Health Care Freedom Act of 2010	Introduced	Jan 5, 2011
	H.R. 219: Social Security Preservation Act of 2011	Introduced	Jan 7, 2011
	H.R. 220: Identity Theft Prevention Act of 2011	Introduced	Jan 7, 2011
	H.R. 150: Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act	Introduced	Jan 5, 2011
	H.R. 147: Prescription Drug Affordability Act	Introduced	Jan 5, 2011
	H.R. 148: To amend title II of the Social Security Act and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide prospectively that wages earned, and self-employment income derived, by individuals who are not citizens or nationals of the United States shall not be credited for coverage under the old-age, survivors, and disability insurance program under such title, and to provide the President with authority to enter into agreements with other nations taking into account such limitation on crediting of wages and self-employment income.	Introduced	Jan 5, 2011
	H.R. 149: Social Security Beneficiary Tax Reduction Act	Introduced	Jan 5, 2011
	H.R. 1094: Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011
	H.R. 1099: Taxpayers' Freedom of Conscience Act of 2011	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011
	H.R. 1101: End the Mandate Act of 2011	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011
	H.R. 1102: Affordable Gas Price Act	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011
	H.R. 1098: Free Competition in Currency Act of 2011	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011
	H.R. 1095: Freedom to Bank Act	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011
	H.R. 1096: Sanctity of Life Act of 2011	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011
	H.R. 1097: Complete and Permanent Property Tax Deduction Act of 2011	Introduced	Mar 15, 2011 Bill Status Last Action H.R. 2769: Parental Consent Act of 2011 Introduced Aug 1, 2011 H.R. 2908: Testimonial Free Speech Act of 2011 Introduced Sep 13, 2011 H.R. 2616: Anti-Terrorism Act of 2011 Introduced Jul 21, 2011 H.R. 2768: Debt Crisis Resolution Act of 2011 Introduced Aug 1, 2011 H.Con.Res. 31: Expressing the sense of Congress that the President is required to obtain in advance specific statutory authorization for the use of United States Armed Forces in response to civil unrest in Libya. Introduced Mar 15, 2011 H.J.Res. 50: Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States relative to abolishing personal income, estate, and gift taxes and prohibiting the United States Government from engaging in business in competition with its citizens. Introduced Mar 15, 2011 H.R. 3267: Protect Small Business Jobs Act of 2011 Introduced Oct 26, 2011 H.R. 3602: Spouse Equity Election Clarification Amendment Act of 2011 Introduced Dec 7, 2011 H.R. 2615: Second Amendment Protection Act of 2011 Introduced Jul 21, 2011 H.R. 954: Family Education Freedom Act of 2011 Introduced Mar 8, 2011 H.R. 955: Professional Educators Tax Relief Act of 2011 Introduced Mar 8, 2011 H.R. 459: Federal Reserve Transparency Act of 2011 Introduced Jan 26, 2011 H.R. 953: Make College Affordable Act of 2011 Introduced Mar 8, 2011 H.R. 958: We the People Act Introduced Mar 8, 2011 H.R. 2614: Entrepreneurship Tax Cut Act of 2011 Introduced Jul 21, 2011 H.R. 956: Education Improvement Tax Cut Act Introduced Mar 8, 2011 H.R. 957: Teacher Tax Cut Act of 2011 Introduced Mar 8, 2011