I presume you are looking at a paper copy of the DesMoines Register for Nov. 21????
You're right. I thought I made that clear. At least clear enough the response didn't rate four question marks.
The on-line copy of that issue doesn't show what you say is there.
I didn't look for it . No need. I think it strange. Do you have the link.
If you have a link, post it.
See above.
By the way, your assumption that there are "no errors", is obviously a stretch.
No errors in copying from the newspaper to my post.
Try to concentrate on the important things. I know it's hard to see the gorilla in the room on this one:
http://spectator.org/archives/2011/11/22/invisible-gorillas-in-the-poli/4
I read most of this. BS is wrong again. The logic about the 98 of 100 vs. 100 of 100 is foohy. Science doesn't always require 100 of 100. In fact it seldom does for years after the first investigations are made and the theory first proposed.
It took years, maybe centuries, before 100 of 100 would agree that the earth revolves around the sun.
We still have lots of doubters about evolution.