|
In order to start at page one of the previously referenced article, use this link
http://spectator.org/archives/2011/11/22/invisible-gorillas-in-the-poli
The link in my post, above, is in error and starts you at page 4. By the way, this is a very interesting article (although I assume the liberals will not have enough energy, understanding, or interest to read it through).
|
|
|
|
||
|
mallcontent won't read it. liberals never read anything that might prove their view wrong. But she will devour extended threads by mobman and repubnucklehead. |
|
|
I presume you are looking at a paper copy of the DesMoines Register for Nov. 21????
You're right. I thought I made that clear. At least clear enough the response didn't rate four question marks.
The on-line copy of that issue doesn't show what you say is there.
I didn't look for it . No need. I think it strange. Do you have the link.
If you have a link, post it.
See above.
By the way, your assumption that there are "no errors", is obviously a stretch.
No errors in copying from the newspaper to my post.
Try to concentrate on the important things. I know it's hard to see the gorilla in the room on this one:
http://spectator.org/archives/2011/11/22/invisible-gorillas-in-the-poli/4 I read most of this. BS is wrong again. The logic about the 98 of 100 vs. 100 of 100 is foohy. Science doesn't always require 100 of 100. In fact it seldom does for years after the first investigations are made and the theory first proposed. We still have lots of doubters about evolution. |
|
|
Lots of doubters about you too. |
Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo
For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!
