There is no mystery as to what you are encountering on this topic with Malodery. All communists lie.
This can be illustrated by one of the most notorious and flagrant lies put forth recently by Noam Chomsky regarding Cambodia. He denies that the communist Kmer Rouge conducted a huge slaughter of the innocent people of that country. This is almost sickening in it's "audacity".
See if this sounds familiar:
Chomsky's articles are full of learned sounding citations, in which he cites all sorts of impeccably respectable sources for all sorts of astonishing facts. Highly improbable facts. How does he do it? Easy. He makes it up.
In Distortions at Fourth Hand [1] , Chomsky and Herman assure us that anything wrong in Cambodia was the fault of the USA, that there was decisive evidence proving the innocence of the Khmer Rouge, evidence which, alas, “space limitations preclude” them from presenting.
Every citation in the entire article was checked. Not one of them was wholly truthful. At best they were slippery equivocations, with the obvious meaning being a lie, and an alternate, hidden meaning, true but irrelevant, to provide an escape hatch should the lie be discovered.
Every citation was a lie in the sense that the material cited failed to support the conclusions that Chomsky leads the reader to believe it proves. In some cases the material cited supported similar but far weaker conclusions, in most cases the opposite – the material cited is evidence for the opposite of what Chomsky leads the reader to believe it shows, for example Schanberg on not seeing bodies.
The art of the lie is standard operating procedure for liberal communists.
