Of course N can be measured. But what you are contending is that Iowa's N in the gulf can be measured. Of that, you have furnished no proof.
Ditto....and never will.
|
Of course N can be measured. But what you are contending is that Iowa's N in the gulf can be measured. Of that, you have furnished no proof.
|
|
|
|
||
|
"Would you agree it's possible to measure the quantity of nitrogen or nitrogen compounds in water? Usually in parts per billion (ppb)."
You don't have to obfuscate and pretend to be ignorant while trying to misdirect this thread.
Of course N can be measured. But what you are contending is that Iowa's N in the gulf can be measured. Of that, you have furnished no proof.
Now the second step. Do you agree that the velocity of a stream can be measured? Maybe we could skip that step if you would agree that our fine government servants can and do measure quite precisely the amount of water that is flowing past a given point on many rivers and streams? Usually expressed in cubic ft. per second (cfs). One location is at the Conesville bridge over the Cedar River. There are many more on larger and smaller streams. Agreed? |
|
|
Getting back to the point, please direct us to any previous post where you showed proof that Iowa's N in the Gulf of Mexico was measured. We won't play "school" with you, or any other egotistical maniac. |
|
|
Getting back to the point, please direct us to any previous post where you showed proof that Iowa's N in the Gulf of Mexico was measured. We won't play "school" with you, or any other egotistical maniac.
Now do we all understand that the government measures the rate of flow in many streams throughout Iowa and the nation and expresses it in cubic feet per second or cfs? |