Mitts mistakes-Muscatine IA-Muscatine

Obama and Bain Capital

By Post Scripts on July 15, 2012 2:17 PM|

Found by Harold E. @ http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/07/obamas-hypocrisy-took-money-from-bain/

Barack Obama and his campaign have been making Mitt Romney's time at Bain Capital one of their premiere mantras that have over and over backfired in their faces. They decided to attack the fact that Bain outsourced jobs during the restructuring of the companies they acquired. So what does Obama have to do with it? During the time he points to, 1999-2002, the executives of Bain donated to Obama for his campaign. No doubt at that time Barack Obama was not at all upset about jobs being outsourced as he got some big, fat checks from the executives.

Ben Shapiro points out, the same SEC form from February 2001 that lists Mitt Romney as "sole shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bain Capital ... the controlling person of Bain Capital" also lists over a dozen other managing directors of Bain Capital, Inc. -- all of whom were undoubtedly more active than Romney was during this period. And President Obama took money from many of them.

Take Joshua Bekenstein. Bekenstein has been a managing director of Bain Capital since 1986. In 2008, he signed Barack Obama a $4,600 check. In 2004, he gave a $50,000 donation to the Democratic National Committee. That's outsourcing money, plain and simple. And Obama was happy to take it.

Or how about Stephen Pagliuca? Last year, he cut a $35,800 check to Barack Obama's Victory Fund. Then he cut another $30,800 check to the DNC. And another $30,800 check to the DCCC. Jonathan Lavine and Mark Nunnelly have both maxed out to Obama already, as well as to the DNC. Lavin was a bundler for Obama, and raised over $100,000 for him. Michael Krupka gave Obama $4,600 in 2008.

Now there is nothing wrong with outsourcing jobs. There is nothing wrong with taking campaign contributions from businesses. The problem comes when one wants to bash his opponent over being in a company that did something you claim is bad and then took money from the very same people. In this case Barack Obama was fine with outsourcing while getting a check, but not fine when it becomes a political advantage.

justcurious Respected Neighbor USA 2371 Posts	A. He claims he had nothing to do with Bain Capital after February 1999. B. He's listed as chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President, and sole stockholder as late as 2002. C. He's paid over $100,000 in annual salary for the years he "had nothing to do with Bain Capital". I will take your supposed 'mistake' that you attribute to Mitt over Obama's admitted mistake of not telling enough 'stories' during his term thus far speaks volumes. Most of us believe we have had quite enough of his 'stories.' July 16th 2012 Report Reply

hiroad Respected Neighbor The Hilltop 5055 Posts	Obama and Bain Capital By Post Scripts on July 15, 2012 2:17 PM\| Found by Harold E. @ http://freedomoutpost.com/2012/07/obamas-hypocrisy-took-money-from-bain/ Barack Obama and his campaign have been making Mitt Romney's time at Bain Capital one of their premiere mantras that have over and over backfired in their faces. They decided to attack the fact that Bain outsourced jobs during the restructuring of the companies they acquired. So what does Obama have to do with it? During the time he points to, 1999-2002, the executives of Bain donated to Obama for his campaign. No doubt at that time Barack Obama was not at all upset about jobs being outsourced as he got some big, fat checks from the executives. Ben Shapiro points out, the same SEC form from February 2001 that lists Mitt Romney as "sole shareholder, sole director, Chief Executive Officer and President of Bain Capital ... the controlling person of Bain Capital" also lists over a dozen other managing directors of Bain Capital, Inc. -- all of whom were undoubtedly more active than Romney was during this period. And President Obama took money from many of them. Take Joshua Bekenstein. Bekenstein has been a managing director of Bain Capital since 1986. In 2008, he signed Barack Obama a $4,600 check. In 2004, he gave a $50,000 donation to the Democratic National Committee. That's outsourcing money, plain and simple. And Obama was happy to take it. Or how about Stephen Pagliuca? Last year, he cut a $35,800 check to Barack Obama's Victory Fund. Then he cut another $30,800 check to the DNC. And another $30,800 check to the DCCC. Jonathan Lavine and Mark Nunnelly have both maxed out to Obama already, as well as to the DNC. Lavin was a bundler for Obama, and raised over $100,000 for him. Michael Krupka gave Obama $4,600 in 2008. Now there is nothing wrong with outsourcing jobs. There is nothing wrong with taking campaign contributions from businesses. The problem comes when one wants to bash his opponent over being in a company that did something you claim is bad and then took money from the very same people. In this case Barack Obama was fine with outsourcing while getting a check, but not fine when it becomes a political advantage. July 16th 2012 Report Reply
mallory Respected Neighbor USA 3461 Posts	"Glenn Kessler, the auther, is a fact checker that doen't always get his facts straight." Neither do you Miss Stanley's or Miss Nitrogen in the Gulf! True, I have been mistaken about facts but not about Stanley and the Gulf Nitrogen. You still come back to those two where you demonstrated your extreme lack of knowledge and intelligence. Why? If I fumbled something that badly, I'd hope it would just go away. You still have not proved either; but I note your admission that you have been mistaken! We still calmy await....either.... BTW...remember.... I am a former Stanley consultant project employee and that I have drawn samples of Iowa's run-off water before. Unlike you. he he he. BS, you know nothing of my experience with Stanley or water samples. Why do you constantly delude yourself. July 16th 2012 Report Reply
mallory Respected Neighbor USA 3461 Posts	I will take your supposed 'mistake' that you attribute to Mitt over Obama's admitted mistake of not telling enough 'stories' during his term thus far speaks volumes. Most of us believe we have had quite enough of his 'stories.' So is it a mistake that he didn't tell enough stories or is it a mistake that he has told too many and turned you off? I missed him saying he didn't tell enough stories. From Fox? July 16th 2012 Report Reply

Muscatine

Mitts mistakes

Obama and Bain Capital

Incorrect username and password combination.