|
Another shooting. Wisconsin, where carry permits aren't allowed. Wonder how many lives could have been saved if one law following person there had been armed.
We can't answer that but we can know that no one would have been shot if we had not allowed the shooter to have a gun.
|
|
|
|
||
|
A round of applause for Mal for proving once again why she is the reigning doofus here.
(For Republican, that's "raining")
That is absolutely the stupidest thing she's ever posted. |
|
|
Malodery: OK, explain yourself....and be quick about it. Why did you allow that idiot to have a gun! We won't forget this. What a screw-up on your part!
When seconds count, the cops are only minutes away. |
|
|
We can't answer that but we can know that no one would have been shot if we had not allowed the shooter to have a gun.
If "we" did not allow farmers to have nitrogen; there would not be ANY nitrogen in the Gulf.....Uh-huh....right!!!!! See how your logic works? I believe I've posted something about sources of nitrogen on this before.
At any rate; no one is screaming for banning the semi-auto pistol announced as the weapon for this latest shooting. It must not look like a military assault-style weapon. Why do looks trigger banning cries? |
Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo
For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!
