Muscatine

I said "commuted".   I did not lie.

Satisfaction. To know that all the effort you put into your liberal agenda was proven bullshit by me. I told you from the get-go that no one can determine what you alleged. But that was not good enough for you. You have droned on and on for months. And still you have not proven your claim and now stand embarrassed after I picked apart every single document you offered by its flaws. You should not enter fields of expertise that you have no training or education in. But you are a f  king know-it-all, aren't you? That's why you have more posts here than anyone else.

That's what I will accomplish. Noting at every turn that you used junk science as a liar!

BS, I've gone back and forth on whether you're really stupid or whether you like to pretend to be stupid to get me to waste time trying to educate you.    I think you might enjoy that to some extent and would go to great lengths to make it happen.

But I now no longer have any doubts.   You are stupid.

The Gulf pollution measurements are simple.

1. Measure the stream flow for a give area and it's pollution load.

2. Measure the drainage area.

3. Calculate the amount of pollution per square mile.

4. Multiply that times the square miles in Iowa.

5. Repeat for several drainage areas to improve the accuracy.

6. Sum the total.

7. That is the contribution of pollution from Iowa to the Gulf.

This has been done over a period of time and the results are known and published and accurate to within a very small error.

You don't know how long I worked with the USGS and will likely never know.    You don't know if or how or what I know about Stanley.   You don't know anything about what work I've done  or even if I ever worked.   You don't know anything about my education.   I would guess my math and science training compares favorably with anyone else here.   So quit inventing a work history for me or an education level.

You can also quit the speculation on who I might really be or whether I have multiple user names.

Just to reinforce what I wrote, your are stupid.   I don't ordinarily use terms as blunt as that, but you have been a consistent bully and name caller and deserve it and I don't feel bad about using it in your case.

And you don't know anything about what you have done, either! You are just a know-it all braggart. As I posted elsewhere, you came here with insulting posts....it is who you are. You started it, my friend!

Please stop giving me orders. You have no right. You don't control this site, davie/joe; as I have always told you.

You made statements here that you were called on. You lied and that has now been proven. You used junk science to back that up and I proved the flaws with that science. You eat your words, Ms stupid Iowa's farm nitrogen in the gulf!

You came here with insulting posts; not me. I have proven that by copying those posts here on this site from 2009 when you joined here under (that) username.

I will now call you on another lie. I have never used atoms or molecules when addressing Iowa's farm nitrogen in the Gulf. Others have; but not me! You are lying again!

Having said that....we don't need to discuss atoms or molecules....we need your proof of Iowa's nitrogen in the Gulf. Your reports do not contain anything other than estimates. And the one report statement you are going to eat is "The study is not intended to evaluate trends in actual stream nutrient loads or determine whether nutrient conditions are getting worse or better.” And this statement makes you and your junk science liars.

What I know about Stanley's, as a former contract employee, is leaps and bounds beyond anything you are guessing about. Remember; you are the one that said your source for Stanley's information was current employees. You never said you were employed there nor that your source was former employees. You had the chance then to lie and say you are a former employee, like me. But you goofed.

Your stupid-assed 7 steps blow yourself out of the "water"! You are not measuring nitrogen already existing in the rivers coming into and flowing thru Iowa. Just as I have repeadedly pointed out. You also don't account for the other elements of nitrogen; WWTP, POTW, landscaping, deer; you pissing, etc. Your argument was over farm run-off nitrogen that is in the Gulf. I see nothing that separates Iowa's farm run-off from all other nitrogen run-off......or have you conveniently forgotten that was your claim? Still....show us Iowa's nitrogen in the Gulf.....leave out the farm nitrogen like you claimed and just show us total Iowa nitrogen.

 How do we multiply the square miles of Montana and Minnesota that drain their nitrogen into Iowa's rivers; and then make that separate?

Uh, huh!