I'm not sure who this dave or davie is, but I provided every word of the quote from the link and the link itself. Judgment is for you, but only upon the link. I've given no indication as to the factuality of the link.
Maybe you'd like to give another link to support your claims?
And your offering has been so judged. It shoots your credibility in the ass, when one does not verify the information they use for their agenda, huh, Dan Rather? The factuality/credibility of your source should be first and foremost critical to you, as your use of that information reflects directly upon the user. Mr. Rather resigned after he got caught because he took responsibility for the error. You don't have kind kind of honor; instead, you now duck any responsibility; as you have always done.
All I did was copy the supposed quote into another search window and found all kind of sites that provided a truthful representation of the total quote; unlike what you did. I too, have no claim. I simply made an observation. It's your credibility that is at stake; you created this post.
