It's a deeply felt conviction among liberals that they are the caring party.  It's not too much to say that liberals are quite confident that they are nicer,  more moral people than conservatives.

It must require truly titanic powers of denial for the "moral" and  "compassionate" party to maintain its position on abortion -- a position that  leads them into some macabre rationalizations. Consciences among the morally  superior party are agreeably quiescent.

But recent headlines have not been similarly cooperative. In Florida, the  legislature is considering a variant of the "Born Alive Infants Protection Act,"  which would require that abortionists provide medical assistance to infants who  are "accidentally" born alive and kicking during an abortion. (Then State  Senator Barack Obama vociferously opposed similar legislation in Illinois.)

Ms. Alisa LaPolt Snow, representing the Florida Alliance of Planned  Parenthood Affiliates, testified against the bill. Florida representative Jim  Boyd, apparently unsure that he had understood her correctly, asked:

"So, um, it is just really hard for me to even ask you this question because  I'm almost in disbelief. If a baby is born on a table as a result of a botched  abortion, what would Planned Parenthood want to have happen to that child that  is struggling for life?"

Ms. Snow responded that her organization "believes that any decision that's  made should be left up to the woman, her family and the physician." In short, as  the Weekly Standard summarized, Florida Planned Parenthood is in favor of  "post-birth abortion." This is consistent with the position of the president of  the United States and most members of the caring party.

Ms. Snow was asked why she didn't support simply transporting a breathing,  moving infant to a hospital where he or she would have the best chance of  survival. Snow developed a sudden concern for ambulance convenience: "(T)hose  situations where it is in a rural health care setting, the hospital is 45  minutes or an hour away, that's the closest trauma center or emergency room. You  know there's just some logistical issues involved that we have some concerns  about." Really? Logistical concerns?

So if a baby is brought to a rural clinic suffering from, say, meningitis,  and the nearest trauma center is 45 minutes away, does Planned Parenthood have  "concerns" about the "logistical issues" involved? Or does Planned Parenthood  stand for the principle that when a woman chooses abortion, she is entitled to a  dead baby?

Snow's testimony comes at an inopportune moment for the deniers -- the  "abortion rights" absolutists who hotly deny that infants are ever born alive  during botched abortions -- because in Philadelphia, an abortionist is on  trial.

Dr. Kermit Gosnell is on trial for murder in the deaths of one woman and  seven second trimester babies. The 41-year-old woman had sought an abortion and  was given an overdose of narcotics at Gosnell's clinic. The seven babies were  all born alive, according to the indictment. Gosnell then used scissors to  "snip" their spinal columns. One of his assistants, who pled guilty to  third-degree murder, said that such "snippings" were "routine" for late-term  abortions -- so there were probably many more than seven.

Gosnell wasn't at all particular about gestational age. An ultrasound  technician recorded the age of one baby as 29.4 weeks, or about 7.5 months. In  Pennsylvania, abortions are not permitted after 24 weeks (and survival is above  85 percent for babies born at 27 weeks). In one case, a nurse testified that a  baby cried after being born. Gosnell snipped his neck and told the nurse that  there was nothing to worry about. He was placed in a basin on a counter. Another  large baby was disposed of in a shoebox, but he was too large and his feet  dangled over the sides. In another case, Gosnell allegedly joked with a nurse  that a baby was so big "he could have walked to the bus stop."

Gosnell seems to be a particularly freakish "provider." He kept fetal feet in  jars in an office prosecutors described as a "house of horrors." (Pictures are  on the Internet, but beware: They are graphic.)

Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer of California who engaged in an unwise  colloquy with then-Senator Rick Santorum about when infants deserve to be  treated as people, spoke for many of the caring elite when she said that life  begins when "you take the baby home from the hospital."

Some day, our descendants will look back at this and ask how we could have  tamely accepted such barbarism. A special obloquy will attach to the Orwellians  who call it compassion.