According to a pair of recent polls, for the first time since the 9/11  terrorist hijackings, Americans are more fearful their government will abuse  constitutional liberties than fail to keep its citizens safe.

Even in the wake of the April 15 Boston Marathon bombing – in which a pair of  Islamic radicals are accused of planting explosives that took the lives of 3 and  wounded over 280 – the polls suggest Americans are hesitant to give up any  further freedoms in exchange for increased “security.”

A  Fox News survey polling a random national sample of 619 registered voters  the day after the bombing found despite the tragic event, those interviewed  responded very differently than following 9/11.

For the first time since a similar question was asked in May 2001, more  Americans answered “no” to the question, “Would you be willing to give up some  of your personal freedom in order to reduce the threat of terrorism?”

Of those surveyed on April 16, 2013, 45 percent answered no to the question,  compared to 43 percent answering yes.

In May 2001, before 9/11, the balance was similar, with 40 percent answering  no to 33 percent answering yes.

But following the terrorist attacks of 9/11, the numbers flipped  dramatically, to 71 percent agreeing to sacrifice personal freedom to  reduce the threat of terrorism.

Subsequent polls asking the same question in 2002, 2005 and 2006 found  Americans consistently willing to give up freedom in exchange for security. Yet  the numbers were declining from 71 percent following 9/11 to only 54 percent by  May 2006.

Now, it would seem, the famous quote widely attributed to Benjamin Franklin –  “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety,  deserve neither liberty nor safety” – is holding more sway with Americans than  it has in over a dozen years.

A similar poll sampling 588 adults, conducted on April 17 and 18 for  the Washington Post, also discovered the change in attitude.

“Which worries you more,” the Post asked, “that the government will not go  far enough to investigate terrorism because of concerns about constitutional  rights, or that it will go too far in compromising constitutional rights in  order to investigate terrorism?”

The poll found 48 percent of respondents worry the government will go too  far, compared to 41 percent who worry it won’t go far enough.

And similar to the Fox News poll, the Post found the worry to be a fresh  development, as only 44 percent worried the government would go too far in  January 2006 and only 27 percent worried the government would go too far in  January 2010.

The Fox News poll was unique in that it further broke the responses down by  political affiliation:

• Bucking the trend, 51 percent of Democrats responded they would  give up personal freedom to reduce the threat of terror, compared to 36 percent  opposed.
• Forty-seven percent of Republicans, on the other hand, opposed giving up  freedoms, compared to only 43 percent in favor.
• Yet independents were the most resistant, with only 29 percent willing to  sacrifice freedom, while 58 percent stood opposed.