Muscatine

Do as I say, not as I do!

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Avatar
  • hiroad
  • Respected Neighbor
  • The Hilltop
  • 5055 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

IRS employees refuse to get shoved into Barack Obama’s crappy health care system

IRS employees refuse to get shoved into Barack Obama's crappy health care system

 

Every other story about Obama’s union pals and government employees demanding waivers from the health-care disaster they supported pale in comparison to this one.  ObamaCare is all about expanding the power of the Internal Revenue Service – that’s the only promise it has actually kept, the only part of the 11,000-page program that’s actually working the way it was supposed to.  The IRS became as important to health care as any doctor or hospital when ObamaCare was passed, because they are its enforcement arm, and like all central planning schemes, there’s a huge amount of enforcing to be done.

And IRS employees want no part of the program they’ll be enforcing on everyone else.  They know better than to get involved in this train wreck.  They like their existing plan, and unlike you, they think they should be able to keep their plan.  All that’s left now is for the “navigators” hired to shepherd confused Americans through the paperwork maze to unionize and demand a waiver from ObamaCare.  I’m not sure if that’s sarcasm or prophecy.

From the Washington Examiner:

National Taxpayer Employee Union officials are urging members to write their congressional representatives in opposition to receiving coverage through President Obama’s health care law.

The union leaders are providing members with a form letter to send to the congressmen that says “I am very concerned about legislation that has been introduced by Congressman Dave Camp to push federal employees out of the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and into the insurance exchanges established under the Affordable Care Act.”

The NTEU represents 150,000 federal employees overall, including most of the nearly 100,000 IRS workers.

This is actually fallout from a previous embarrassing “no ObamaCare for us!” spectacle, in which congressional representatives began moaning that they can’t possibly retain the gigantic imperial retinue of staffers they deserve, if they have to start managing their offices under the same terms they cheerfully imposed upon private-sector businesses.  Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI), chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, introduced a bill that would push every federal worker into the ObamaCare exchanges, the same way Barack Obama is trying to shove every American into the public exchanges.  That’s where you end up when your employer realizes Obama is offering him cash-money incentives to kill your health care plan, as well as cut your hours back to part-time, if possible.

As ObamaCare gadfly Avik Roy observed at Forbes, there is a melancholy aspect to Camp’s legislation, because the Federal Employee Health Benefits Program “has long been considered a model for market-based reform of the Medicare and Medicaid programs.”

In the FEHBP, employees get to choose amongst a wide variety of plans offered by private insurers. The employer–the government–then subsidizes about three-fourths of the cost to the employee. The employee can choose a more generous or expensive plan if he wants, but he has to pay for a portion of the difference in price, and vice versa. As a result of this approach, FEHBP plans have organically evolved to contain the benefits and financial features that consumers want. By contrast, any minor change to Medicare requires an act of Congress.

Roy generally agrees with the principle of “ObamaCare for all, or ObamaCare for none” but wishes FEHBP could be kept alive as a model for true reform.  ”Indeed, if Obamacare had allowed Americans to participate in the same system that federal employees enjoy, it would have been a much better law,” he writes.

I take his point, but really, if ObamaCare is not repealed soon, there’s no point in keeping any superior market-based model programs alive.  The ObamaCare death spiral will involve progressively less market choice, as insurance plans continue to disappear, doctors contract their practices, and even hospitals go belly-up (something the Medicare trustees anticipate will begin happening around 2019.)  The secret true purpose of ObamaCare is to wipe out private insurance and pave the way for single-payer socialized medicine, which is why every story about the disintegration of the President’s scheme includes another group of Americans forced into the public exchanges.  The longer this goes on, the less interest anyone at the controls of this train wreck will have in “market-based reforms.”  There’s no reason to let a few privileged public employees enjoy superior insurance benefits to preserve a museum of What Could Have Been.

I suspect Rep. Camp’s resolve will only be strengthened by the news that IRS employees want one of those priceless ObamaCare waivers that most of us can only dream about.  ”If the Obamacare exchanges are good enough for the hardworking Americans and small businesses the law claims to help, then they should be good enough for the president, vice president, Congress and federal employees,” a spokeswoman said of the Congressman’s initiative.  That goes double for the government employees who will collecting all those trans-Constitutional “tax penalties” from the rest of us.  You want out of this nightmare, IRS employees?  I don’t blame you a bit.  Join the ObamaCare repeal movement.

  • Avatar
  • nigel
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine
  • 773 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Absolutely no surprise here.  The rats are jumping off of the sinking ship.

 

  • Avatar
  • hiroad
  • Respected Neighbor
  • The Hilltop
  • 5055 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Do These Emails Between the IRS and the FEC Suggest Collusion in Targeting Conservative Groups?

A series of emails between a senior Internal Revenue Service official and an attorney in the Federal Election Commission’s general counsel’s office suggests the two agencies may have “colluded” in targeting conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status, according to a new report in National Review Online.

The report is based on emails obtained exclusively by NRO and the House Ways and Means Committee.

Correspondences between embattled IRS official Lois Lerner, who earlier this year invoked her Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, and an FEC attorney suggest “the discrimination of conservative groups extended beyond the IRS and into the FEC,” NRO’s Eliana Johnson wrote.

Lerner worked for the FEC from 1986 to 1995. She became famous within the agency for her “aggressive” investigation of conservative groups.

An attorney from the FEC’s “enforcement division in at least one case sought and received tax information about the status of a conservative group, the American Future Fund, before recommending that the commission prosecute it for violations of campaign-finance law,” Johnson added.

The FEC attorney wrote in an email to Lerner in February 2009: “Several months ago . . . I spoke with you about the American Future Fund, a 501(c)(4) organization that had submitted an exemption application the IRS [sic].”

The FEC, the NRO report notes, is not exempted under Rule 6103, which prohibits the IRS from sharing sensitive taxpayer data. Nevertheless, it appears Lerner and an FEC attorney were trading confidential taxpayer information.

From the attorney: “When we spoke last July, you had told us that the American Future Fund had not received an exemption letter from the IRS.”

That sentence alone should raise some concerns.

The attorney also inquired about status of another conservative group, the American Issues Project.

 

“I was also wondering if you could tell me whether the IRS had issued an exemption letter to a group called the American Issues Project? The group also appears to be the successor of two other organizations, Citizens for the Republic and Avenger, Inc.,” the attorney wrote.

The attorney asked whether there was “any information and documents that would be publicly available in relation to the American Issues Project, Citizens for the Republic, or Avenger, Inc.”

But let’s go back to the situation involving the American Future Fund. Johnson provided some background and context on the issue:

The timing of the correspondence between Lerner and the FEC suggests the FEC attorney sought information from the IRS in order to influence an upcoming vote by the six FEC commissioners. The FEC received a complaint in March 2008 from the Minnesota Democratic Farmer Labor Party alleging that the American Future Fund had violated campaign-finance law by engaging in political advocacy without registering as a political-action committee.

The American Future Fund responded to that complaint in June 2008, telling the commission that it had applied for tax exemption in March of that year and was a “501(c)(4) social-welfare organization that was organized to provide Americans with a conservative and free-market viewpoint and mechanism to communicate and advocate on the issues that most interest and concern them.” According to the e-mail correspondence, a month after receiving the American Future Fund’s response, the FEC general counsel’s office — which is prohibited under law from conducting an investigation into an organization before the FEC’s six commissioners have voted to do so — contacted Lerner to investigate the agency’s tax-exempt status.

The FEC general counsel’s office apparently failed to inform agency commissioners of how it obtained its knowledge of the group’s tax-exempt status. The office recommended commissioners prosecute the conservative group, writing: “According to its response, AFF submitted an application for tax-exempt status to the Internal Revenue Service . . . on March 18, 2008.”

But despite the urgings of the FEC general counsel’s office, the agency’s commissioners voted 6-0 to close the case against American Future Fund.

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) and oversight subcommittee Chairman Charles Boustany (R-La.) have called on the IRS to provide the committee with all communications between itself and the FEC between 2008 and 2012

Click here to read the full NRO report.

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow