Muscatine

FYI Hillary

Posted in: Muscatine

I have one e mail account, one web page, and one cell phone.  I erase e mails all the time, throw out my drafts, delete old messages, throw out junk mail and mail I deem junk or not needed to keep.  I have had over 9,000 e mails that I got stored and my server told me I was going to fill up if I didn't start eliminating some.  The Secretary of State has 50,000 e mails that she gave to them, I think that is enough.

One question, are the same elected officials that are climbing Hillary for her E mails the same that just committed TREASON in sending the letter to IRAN?

 

BTW; she never gave "emails" to anyone. The requirement is that fed employees provide the actual electronic mail; not printed copies. 50,000 printed copies of purported emails that she gave to them does not qualify. They cannot be electronicaly scanned and searched for edits or other fraud to verify truthfulness as is required. A slick willy trick. She has learned from him well....

 

The bitch has not complied with anything yet.

  • Stock
  • republican
  • Respected Neighbor
  • Muscatine, IA
  • 749 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

She doesn't have to comply with anything.  

 

The fact that these signatures are from U.S. Officials is irrelevant, its still an attempt to overthrow the U.S. President.  

 

Also, Hillary isn't a bitch, she had both a legal mom and dad, and is married.  One true fact everyone of the signatories to that letter have an ass hole.  I'm 100% sure of that. 

  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

I have one e mail account, one web page, and one cell phone.  I erase e mails all the time, throw out my drafts, delete old messages, throw out junk mail and mail I deem junk or not needed to keep.  I have had over 9,000 e mails that I got stored and my server told me I was going to fill up if I didn't start eliminating some.  The Secretary of State has 50,000 e mails that she gave to them, I think that is enough.

One question, are the same elected officials that are climbing Hillary for her E mails the same that just committed TREASON in sending the letter to IRAN?

 

Sen. Cotton: Why we wrote the letter to Iran

        Tom Cotton    8:32 p.m. EDT March 10, 2015

Iranian leaders need to know that the Senate must approve any deal President Obama negotiates.

 

The critical role of Congress in the adoption of international agreements was clearly laid out by our Founding Fathers in our Constitution. And it's a principle upon which Democrats and Republicans have largely agreed.

In fact, then-Sen. Joe Biden once reflected on this very topic, writing that "the president and the Senate are partners in the process by which the United States

It's not often I agree with former senator and now Vice President Biden, but his words here are clear. The Senate must approve any deal President Obama negotiates with Iran by a two-thirds majority vote.

Anything less will not be considered a binding agreement when President Obama's term expires in two years. This is true of any agreement, but in particular with the nuclear deal President Obama intends to strike with Iran.

Unfortunately, despite our best efforts, the Obama administration has so far completely bypassed Congress in its negotiations with Iran.

The administration cares little about what will win congressional approval — only complete nuclear disarmament — and more about just reaching some sort of deal.

Regrettably, it appears the deal President Obama is negotiating with Iran will not be a good one. In fact, if reports are correct, it will be a bad one that will ultimately allow Iran to continue its nuclear program and ultimately develop a nuclear weapon.

That is why this week, I, along with 46 of my fellow senators, wrote Iranian leaders  to inform them of the role Congress plays in approving their agreement. Our goal is simple: to stop Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

I do not take my obligations as a senator lightly. Nor do those who are signatories to the letter. If the president won't share our role in the process with his negotiating partner, we won't hesitate to do it ourselves.

Our constituents elected us to the Senate, in part, to protect them from bad agreements like this and to help ensure their safety and security. And that is what we intend to do.

Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee and the lead signatory to the open letter to Iran's leaders.

doesn't matter why they broke they law, they all broke the law when they signed that letter. So the rulers can break the laws put in place to control the government. The reason didn't matter for snowden or manning. McCain and Graham are traitors for their meetings with ISIS leaders and so be charge.

  • Avatar
  • mobaydave
  • Respected Neighbor
  • muskateen
  • 3907 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

The Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that forbids unauthorized citizens from negotiating with foreign governments having a dispute with the U.S. It was intended to prevent the undermining of the government's position. The Act was passed following George Logan's unauthorized negotiations with France in 1798, and was signed into law by President John Adams on January 30, 1799. The Act was last amended in 1994, and violation of the Logan Act is a felony.

 

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow