I don't care what political party they are, Bush has a much higher potential to start a war than Hillary. His family's fortune has been greatly enhanced by war, and its killing of Americans. A vote for Hillary is by far much better than a vote for Bush. What remains to be determined is if he will even get the nomination.
Besides, Hillary already stated she will go to war: On April 22, 2008, Clinton threatened Iran with nuclear annihilation if they attacked Israel with nuclear weapons. On ABC News Good Morning America, she said, "If Iran were to launch a nuclear attack on Israel what would our response be? I want the Iranians to know that if I'm the president, we will attack Iran. That's what we will do. There is no safe haven." She continued, "Whatever stage of development they might be in their nuclear weapons program in the next 10 years during which they may foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them.
You have also forgotten that your choice (Billary) voted in favor of allowing Bush to go to war! I can't quite say that she is the least likely to go to war like you are suggesting, since she made the statement above AND authorized Bush to go to war. When will you libs who hate war hold those Dems accountable for approving it and allowing it to happen?
"On October 11, 2002, Clinton voted in favor of the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq, commonly known as the Iraq War Resolution, to give President Bush complete authority for the Iraq War."