Hypocrisy 101
At the risk of sounding tiresome, OH PUHLEEZE!
Before any support for this hypocritical boor gains traction, let me remind the readers of a few things. Mr. Shaver, where were your complaints when you had all your ?“Shaverettes?” (yes, Sabatino hit the mark with that one) deluge this forum in 2003 and subsequent times after when you made a call for support? I was one of the ones you called upon to post in this forum to support your position. You say that for too long Pickerington has been the Wild West. I say nothing has changed. Still the same old egotistical political games as you claim our good friends Randy, Lou and Joyce played, but since you claim to be a good guy, all your vile politics are good politics?
Many rumors are based in fact. If you don?’t like the rumors, state the fact to refute them. Prove them false or shut up. This is America, your highness, and we have the right to free speech. Blogs such as this are the most prolific forum for the free exchange of ideas in our country. You also have the right to not read this if you believe it false. Please do us all the favor of staying away while the rest of us TRULY interested in good government communicate. Your interest in good government is to assure Shaverville remains Shaverville. It appears to be slipping away.
I hope you stay away but please allow one of your Shaverettes to expound on the anonymous packages to newspapers allusion. Since this is not the first time in your illustrious tenure that anonymous packages have been delivered involving you, we are curious. Even more curious is the FACT that the last package I remember being sent turned out to be factual, was it not? Given your sudden reappearance on this scene, is it safe to assume that this new package may also be factual and you are simply affecting some damage control up front? The last package was distributed by someone close to you. Was this one?
Mr. Shaver, you needn?’t defend Bruce Rigelman. He is perfectly capable of defending himself and has done so admirably. He doesn?’t stoop to your level. He presents lucid and rational arguments. He has suffered attacks for years on this site. He rose above the maelstrom and maintained his dignity and maintained the respect of the vast majority of the community. Don?’t do him the dishonor of associating yourself with him. He is too good a man to be saddled with insincere and suspect politicos such as any of the Shaverettes. His star continues to shine while the Shaverettes?’ dims.
Don?’t you ever get tired of defending your inner circle? Don?’t you ever ask yourself why you have to keep defending someone that is supposedly so innocent of everything? You?’re an attorney for goodness sake. If you were to defend a client weekly and appear in court with this person hanging on your arm week after week, wouldn?’t you or someone you trust start to ask why you keep at it? Don?’t you ever realize how much you sound exactly like Randy, Lou and Joyce defending your ever-diminishing list of allies?
more to come.....
By Adamantly Anonymous
At the risk of sounding tiresome, OH PUHLEEZE!
Before any support for this hypocritical boor gains traction, let me remind the readers of a few things. Mr. Shaver, where were your complaints when you had all your ?“Shaverettes?” (yes, Sabatino hit the mark with that one) deluge this forum in 2003 and subsequent times after when you made a call for support? I was one of the ones you called upon to post in this forum to support your position. You say that for too long Pickerington has been the Wild West. I say nothing has changed. Still the same old egotistical political games as you claim our good friends Randy, Lou and Joyce played, but since you claim to be a good guy, all your vile politics are good politics?
Many rumors are based in fact. If you don?’t like the rumors, state the fact to refute them. Prove them false or shut up. This is America, your highness, and we have the right to free speech. Blogs such as this are the most prolific forum for the free exchange of ideas in our country. You also have the right to not read this if you believe it false. Please do us all the favor of staying away while the rest of us TRULY interested in good government communicate. Your interest in good government is to assure Shaverville remains Shaverville. It appears to be slipping away.
I hope you stay away but please allow one of your Shaverettes to expound on the anonymous packages to newspapers allusion. Since this is not the first time in your illustrious tenure that anonymous packages have been delivered involving you, we are curious. Even more curious is the FACT that the last package I remember being sent turned out to be factual, was it not? Given your sudden reappearance on this scene, is it safe to assume that this new package may also be factual and you are simply affecting some damage control up front? The last package was distributed by someone close to you. Was this one?
Mr. Shaver, you needn?’t defend Bruce Rigelman. He is perfectly capable of defending himself and has done so admirably. He doesn?’t stoop to your level. He presents lucid and rational arguments. He has suffered attacks for years on this site. He rose above the maelstrom and maintained his dignity and maintained the respect of the vast majority of the community. Don?’t do him the dishonor of associating yourself with him. He is too good a man to be saddled with insincere and suspect politicos such as any of the Shaverettes. His star continues to shine while the Shaverettes?’ dims.
Don?’t you ever get tired of defending your inner circle? Don?’t you ever ask yourself why you have to keep defending someone that is supposedly so innocent of everything? You?’re an attorney for goodness sake. If you were to defend a client weekly and appear in court with this person hanging on your arm week after week, wouldn?’t you or someone you trust start to ask why you keep at it? Don?’t you ever realize how much you sound exactly like Randy, Lou and Joyce defending your ever-diminishing list of allies?
more to come.....
By Adamantly Anonymous