Pickerington Area Taxpayers Alliance

The author of no on 9 prompted me to post. I see his headline was Anonymous.

I think that poster trying to impress us with his knowledge of the issue isn't smart enough to read the ''your headline'' and ''your name (optional)'' at the start of a discussion and has them backwards.

And they want me to vote no. They've got it all backwards.

By ''YES'' on Issue 9

Yes or Anonymous - Rita Ricketts

You ''posters'' really are cute(?). Makes no difference whether you are ''anonymous'' or ''Vote Yes on No. 9'', you are afraid to put your name on the posting.

A follow-up.

The posting with my name in the title was really Rita Ricketts. I do not want to be ''anonymous.''

Ladies and gentlemen

Well, looky who's here. Let's chat. It's nice to see a Fix eco-supporter finally rear it's head probably because 9's in serious trouble of failure. Nice to have an idea of your position.

I guess the plan then is STILL to exclude Pickerington even with the 5 way MOU in place if 9 passes? Remeber the urgency to pass the Fix proposal? Deeds speak volumes.
The plan was and is to always to exclude Pickerinton. (I'll cite examples if you like.) Since this suicide agreement didn't work and has been shot down in flames, it's on to Plan B and threaten Pickerington will lose millions (scare them seniors), be excluded from the 5 way (egad), watch out for former officials (those villians and their church going families) and all will be well for the township. Sorry, we residents who ARE NOT FORMER OFFICIALS take exception to the threats, are well funded, and ready to fight for our city!!!

Willow pond. Pr-6.
Big box rezoning aps.
Annexing to the city probably makes your stomch turn.

Thanks but no thanks for your no stance on 9.
We'll be voting YES!!

By Exact opposite of you