OK, so the Pickerington school board replaced a superintendent making $142,000 a year with a tyrant making $144,000 a year.
Except she retired as superintendent from the Sycamore school district July 31, 2006. So she's ''double dipping''.
She then went to work for Piqua schools for $117,000 a year, where she lasted 9 months.
But I thought the advantage to a school district in the ''double dipping'' scenario was that they could hire someone for a smaller salary because they were already receiving retirement benefits.
So how much money a year does she actually bring in?
Could someone on the board (Lisa Reade or one of the Readettes) please explain how the board is being fiscally responsible in hiring a superintendent at an exorbitant salary + retirement benefits for our school district?
I'd appreciate it.
By Tired of the crap
Except she retired as superintendent from the Sycamore school district July 31, 2006. So she's ''double dipping''.
She then went to work for Piqua schools for $117,000 a year, where she lasted 9 months.
But I thought the advantage to a school district in the ''double dipping'' scenario was that they could hire someone for a smaller salary because they were already receiving retirement benefits.
So how much money a year does she actually bring in?
Could someone on the board (Lisa Reade or one of the Readettes) please explain how the board is being fiscally responsible in hiring a superintendent at an exorbitant salary + retirement benefits for our school district?
I'd appreciate it.
By Tired of the crap