Pickerington Area Taxpayers Alliance

We need 1.3 million.
No, we need 1.7 million.
Sticking the workforce will raise 1.7 million.
No wait. It will raise 2.8 million.
Oh what the heck, let's run with what we're doing and get our hands on the 2.8 million.

How about asking for an increase to meet TRUE needs? 1/4% then? 1/2%then? Having faith in the decisions at city hall are also at stake in this election.

I will vote NO because I have no faith in this decision they've made. After it fails we will see council come back with a reasonable increase.

By Keep two hands on your wallet

What is a need?

Please explain it to me because I'm sure your needs are different than mine.

You'll be reading it soon

The literature the city is going to spend $10,000.00 on will be full of the NEEDS.

The amount spent will be higher unless page 2 of the Parks and Red brochure about their NEEDS is included in that expenditure.

This money being spent could easily be reason No. 4 of the City has enough if they didn't waste it series.

By Keep two hands on your wallet

Where in writing

Are credits guaranteed?
Are they in the ballot language?
And if not, why not?
Who's word should we take for it?
Mike Sabatino's?
Keith Smith's?
Jeff Fix's?
Staffs?
Or some poster here named anonymous?
Or is there even a plan for the next 3-5-10-20 years?
When should we expect the next income tax increase?


By Keep two hands on your wallet