Pickerington Area Taxpayers Alliance

PATA Answers Here

Posted in: PATA
  • Stock
  • bybju
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 209 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor
Dear Annie and Old Geezer,

I will attempt to answer your questions here. I feel we do not have anything to hide as an organization. And I certainly do not feel as though we are a fringe organization. Our vision and mission statement and how we came about are posted on the site in the ?“Our Pages?” section on the left-hand side of your screen. I will also post our ''Articles of Association,'' which we created and adopted by vote in January of 2000.

PATA started as a telephone conversation between Bill Miller and myself after a school board meeting. Bill?’s observation was that there were many ?“individuals?” pursuing issues in the community on a daily basis. His reference to the Kroger referendum which I attempted and failed at, and several zoning hearings and school board meetings at which we had seen each other, and had casually met others who took the time to attend and voice their opinions. I told him how it is easy to become burned out as one person following so many issues. He suggested we call others who would be interested in these issues and form a group to achieve some efficiency in addressing them and also be able to pool the resources of the individuals involved and gain knowledge about how to be effective. So PATA is Bill?’s idea, achieved, with the synergy of a group of viewpoints, attempting to make a difference in the community.

We do not disclose member names in PATA or identify officers unless the individual wants to make that disclosure himself/herself. We believe in their right to privacy and to serve behind the scenes for whatever reason, is fair. No posting of names will occur and as we are associated, we are not required to do such. Some people do fear reprisal upon themselves or family members if their association with this or any group is revealed due to the nature of some of the focus issues we attempt to address. I feel sad that anyone in this community has to feel this way but obviously it is a valid concern.

We hold public meetings as issues dictate. We announce these in the local weekly papers and on this site. We hold PATA membership meetings periodically, but rely on email and phone calls for the day to day operation of the organization.

We do not publish minutes of our meetings, and are not required to, we prefer to utilize this web site and our newsletter to inform the community of issues we are concerned with.

We attempt to post documentation from governmental sources and letters from elected and appointed officials to validate our positions. This allows those who do not have easy access to such information to read it and see what really happens, many of these items never make it into the local press. We also publish individual member?’s letters of concern to governmental agencies to outline issues for further public knowledge.

We are organized into three focus teams at this point in time. The City focus team, The Violet Township Focus Team, and the Pickerington Schools Focus Team. As issues dictate we may break into special interest groups with individuals willing to do in depth study on certain issues, such as Emergency Legislation, Pickerington Ponds development impact, Zoning issues which exist in the city and township, and annexation issues.

continued...Please see PATA Answers part Two below
  • Stock
  • bybju
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 209 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor
PATA Answers Part Two

There are many different opinions in PATA and school issues seem to be the most divisive as is such in the overall community. But I can faithfully tell you that most if not all members believe that we should try to achieve cooperation between government entities in our community. Most believe that a merger of the city and township is not required to do such. We also believe comprehensive and multi-jurisdictional land use planning would benefit the entire community. We believe the protective nature of low density rural zoning that exists in the township should not be changed to allow higher density housing developments in the city or township without significant public input and a benefit shown to the entire community. Parks and recreational areas included in developments, significant donated money infusions from developers to our schools or the donation of land suitable to build schools are some benefits to the community. Government officials may not be able to directly ask a developer for a generous check to our schools in exchange for allowing additional homes to be built in our community. But the public has no such constraints and can ask, IF GIVEN A CHANCE, in a valid zoning hearing PRIOR TO ANY ZONING CHANGE either in conjunction with an annexation or a simple zoning change in the township to a different zoning class. We will only get better developments if we ask for them. Accepting what comes through the door as the final plan, without valid public input is a tragedy when public input has made a substantial impact on the configuration of developments and has reduced the numbers of homes in given developments when given a valid chance. The bottom line of these efforts is less impact on the infrastructure that we pay for, especially the big-ticket items such as our schools. We believe that those who pay the bills should have a valid say in what it costs.

I think many members of the community share these same beliefs or will begin to as their tax bills continue to increase and our government officials choose to do little to control the housing growth causing the problem. We have often heard the line from our elected officials that ''you want to close the door after you get in?…and who let you in.'' The fact is, the developers market us and the successful school system we all help to create to fuel the building boom and enhance their financial sucess. That is their business and the marketability of the area is very important to their bottom line. I say, If they market me and the quality of life my family brings to this community, I feel as though I should have a say in the rate of growth that I can sustain as a taxpayer in order to maintain that quality of life. I should become part of their marketing concerns because I demand to be. Abuse me... and the market you enjoy will be gone. They come here because I am here and those before me were here and we make this place great! Managing growth to a survivable level is a most reasonable request of our elected officials in my view.

I invite you to express your opinion on these issues too.

Please visit the ?“Our pages section'' of this site on the left side of your screen for the Articles of Association and our vision and mission statements.

Thank you for the opportunity to shed light on our organization,

Lisa Ross








Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_1682638-attention.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow