Quoting from the Columbus Dispatch 8/15/2002.
?…
One issue would limit housing to two units per acre, which Mapes says could exclude low-income families in violation of the Federal Fair Housing Act. That law prohibits practices that deny housing to people because of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
?…
Councilman Doug Parker said the density ordinance would keep out young couples who want a small ''starter'' house and the elderly who want to live in a nursing facility. If the density issue passes at the polls, Parker expects lawsuits on the grounds that it discriminates against the ''economically challenged.''
End quote.
Ok, I?’m not a lawyer but using the logic from above how can any density-related ordinances be valid including the current ones the township and city ?“enforce?”? Doesn?’t R-4 limit those who can?’t afford to live in ?“starter?” homes? What if I want to buy 10 acres and build a trailer-park on it? How can you deny me this ''right'' since those who will live there can?’t afford the current homes being built in the area? Is Pickerington in Violation of the Federal Fair Housing Act as we speak? What about the migrant workers living here in Central Ohio? Aren?’t we preventing them from living in Pickerington since they are ?“economically challenged?” and can?’t afford houses on R-4 lots?
And by the way, in case no one has realized it ?– there are a few hundred ?“starter?” homes already here in the city and the township. Occasionally people do move out of ?“starter?” homes into larger homes and would therefore free up these less expensive homes for ?“young couples?”.
Sorry but I?’m not buying that argument.
?…
One issue would limit housing to two units per acre, which Mapes says could exclude low-income families in violation of the Federal Fair Housing Act. That law prohibits practices that deny housing to people because of their race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
?…
Councilman Doug Parker said the density ordinance would keep out young couples who want a small ''starter'' house and the elderly who want to live in a nursing facility. If the density issue passes at the polls, Parker expects lawsuits on the grounds that it discriminates against the ''economically challenged.''
End quote.
Ok, I?’m not a lawyer but using the logic from above how can any density-related ordinances be valid including the current ones the township and city ?“enforce?”? Doesn?’t R-4 limit those who can?’t afford to live in ?“starter?” homes? What if I want to buy 10 acres and build a trailer-park on it? How can you deny me this ''right'' since those who will live there can?’t afford the current homes being built in the area? Is Pickerington in Violation of the Federal Fair Housing Act as we speak? What about the migrant workers living here in Central Ohio? Aren?’t we preventing them from living in Pickerington since they are ?“economically challenged?” and can?’t afford houses on R-4 lots?
And by the way, in case no one has realized it ?– there are a few hundred ?“starter?” homes already here in the city and the township. Occasionally people do move out of ?“starter?” homes into larger homes and would therefore free up these less expensive homes for ?“young couples?”.
Sorry but I?’m not buying that argument.