Pickerington Area Taxpayers Alliance

Homewood wants plats by emergenc

Posted in: PATA
I have asked the webmaster to post the letter from Homewood?’s CEO to Pickerington Mayor Randall Hughes. The quality of the copy received has made copying for a straight scan to be legible difficult. For that reason the webmaster also included the complete text of the letter within the ?“Our Pages?” posting ?– Final Plat Approvals by Emergency Ordinance.

It is hoped that this will better inform concerned area residents.
  • Stock
  • bybju
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 209 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor
contract

Please note in the John Bain letter posted on teh our pages side the words, ''pre-annexation agreement CONTRACT'' I hope the attorneys litigating the contract zoning issue in the courts against the city are getting a copy of this letter. Contract Zoning is illegal under current Ohio Law. It seems everyone is referring to these agreements as ''contracts'' except the city!

I attended a council meeting in December of 1999 and heard Mr. Postage tell the room that city council will NEVER pass a zoning as an emergency, never has, never will! A funny thing happened after that meeting, Nearly every single zoning legislation issue since that date has been passed as an emergency including the acceptance of this annexation and contemporaneous rezoning the land to R-4 as stated in the pre annexation agreement. If that would not have passed as an emergency, the referendum would have occured on the zoning at that time. Nobody wanted to wait until the platting phase. Council's deliberate use of emergency legislation to circumvent referendum is why the action has occured so late in the game.

I think Homewood has weaker attorneys than Dominion. Dominion inserted language on the Diley Associates land, pre annexation agreement, stated that the annexation would not take place if any challenge of the zoning by referendum took place. They laid it out right up front for everyone to see who council was supporting with their votes. Homewood's pre-agreement lacked such statements and that is why Mr. Bain is forced to grovel to the city now.The city who continues to act against the will of the residents of this community. If they (council)were in touch with what people wanted in this community, they never would have allowed this development, in this manner, in the first place.

Homewood has brought us many of the developments in the Tussing area, including an action to disturb and relocate a pioneer cemetery in the area. They moved the gravestones to a new location so they could build there, but somehow forgot to move the remains of those who were founding pioneers in this area. The remains were discovered when they began to dig for a single family home basement, the contractor had no idea what lay below the dirt.


Is this the kind of developer you trust with ''protecting'' the Pickerington Ponds without iron-clad contracts dictating what protections they will provide in their development of this land? Can you trust them to honor their word or any promise they make to the community, city or school officials?

Homewood, just go away, you have made millions here, on the reputation of our school system and you continue to market the people who live here and the quality of life we bring to the community in your own interest.... period. WE deserve a say in what the heck you do next to a fragile ecosystem and how much we want to pay to educate the children who will move into your community since your donation will not cover the impact of such. Don't try to sell your side of the story by telling anyone that you do anything in the best interest of our community! We are not fools. The only foolish thing we did is let you run rampant over this community for so many years! We have had enough.
PR Value

I hope that you all recognize the ''PR'' value of publicizing the contents of this memo. While it's not all that uncommon in the course of today's business for a deal to be structured this way, it is uncommon for the details of a proposal contingent on denying voters rights to get put in writing, and to fall into the hands of those with oppossing viewpoints.

I was shocked when I saw it referenced in the paper. I sent a copy, along with the best ''press release'' format that I could copy from our company's communication department, but I've heard nothing from any news organization yet.

Pointing out to the citizens of Pickerington the substance of this memo, just as they are considering initiatives to limit Council's power to ''make deals'', may have more impact than anything else you have to say...

In the end, it basically says ''stop them from voting, or we won't give your schools the money we promised, and we won't set aside land to protect the wetlands''...Could they have said anything more likely to offend Pickerington voters?

I'll keep doing my best to get this message out, and thanks to those on this site who are doing the same.


By Gary Johnson
Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_12477899-big-head.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow