I see the Times-Sun published another letter from our friend Mike Kasson. Remember Mike, the BIA toady, that ran the campaign againest the three initiative issue that was on the ballot last November? Now he is questioning the motives of those that are circulating these recall petitions.
First he claims those running the recall are from the Towsnhip. Well he is about as right as he was last November. One of the four that are running the recall is from the township. Wasn't that the same presentage that his side lost by last November?
He then claims that those running the recall are from PATA yet offers no proof because none exists. So Mr. Kasson's credibility should be called into question because of his wild untrue accusations.
Then he claims it is to benifit the Politians that have lost in the past. The two councilmen up for re-election both say they are not running and both lost their elections in the 2002 central committee races. So if these two up for re-election are not running how does the recall removing them before the election benifit the challengers? Please help follow this logic. The other two councilmen are up for re-election in 2005 so who is he talking about then?
I wonder why he left out the part of not doing anything wrong. What about the court order to the left of this city council violating a court order posted under the heading of ''GRAY LETTER''. Please don't take the words of a group of redicals that post public documents that this council then tries to deny. Please read for yourself.
If you don't believe the web master go to the court house and get a copy that you are 100% sure of instead of 75% sure of. I have seen these court decision and it is valid. I know 25% of you won't believe it, so continue to believe in good old Mike Kasson because he likes to improve his image by association and hanging out with those in charge.
By Concerned Citizen
First he claims those running the recall are from the Towsnhip. Well he is about as right as he was last November. One of the four that are running the recall is from the township. Wasn't that the same presentage that his side lost by last November?
He then claims that those running the recall are from PATA yet offers no proof because none exists. So Mr. Kasson's credibility should be called into question because of his wild untrue accusations.
Then he claims it is to benifit the Politians that have lost in the past. The two councilmen up for re-election both say they are not running and both lost their elections in the 2002 central committee races. So if these two up for re-election are not running how does the recall removing them before the election benifit the challengers? Please help follow this logic. The other two councilmen are up for re-election in 2005 so who is he talking about then?
I wonder why he left out the part of not doing anything wrong. What about the court order to the left of this city council violating a court order posted under the heading of ''GRAY LETTER''. Please don't take the words of a group of redicals that post public documents that this council then tries to deny. Please read for yourself.
If you don't believe the web master go to the court house and get a copy that you are 100% sure of instead of 75% sure of. I have seen these court decision and it is valid. I know 25% of you won't believe it, so continue to believe in good old Mike Kasson because he likes to improve his image by association and hanging out with those in charge.
By Concerned Citizen
