Thank you PATA for providing the whole document?…. Not the Newspaper version of just the front page. ?…. An ?‘atta boy?’ to This Week in Pickerington?’s Michael Maurer for at least looking past the bull _hit that Postage keeps swilling with his press releases and saying there was something about the VOTER APPROVED density limit issue in this Community Authority hoax.
To _ell with that damn BIA that PATA proved was behind the NO on Issue 17 last fall
The Development industry and their dirty puppets on the Council, Mayor?’s office, and Pickerington School Board are attempting to create zoning in this trumped up Community Authority. Office holders in the City should be thrown in jail if they vote to approve this right beside McAuliffe. Schools Board members should be put in stocks and publicly put to shame of allowing and supporting an illegal practice of creating zoning law here. How dare them. They don?’t belong with anything in our children?’s education if they lead by such poor example.
Hart ?“deal?” #14
The parties hereto recognize that the City has entered into contracts with one or more of the
Private Developers or owners, which contracts include pre-annexation agreements entered into
I
prior to November 5,2002. In addition, the City has rezoned property owned by one or more of the
Private Developers or owners approving final development plans and subdivision plats prior to
November 5, 2002. Prior to November 5, 2002, there were no density limitations applicable to
such developments other than as were determined by the City Zoning Code as it existed prior to
November 5, 2002. After the City entered into the pre-annexation agreements, approved final
development plans and/or final subdivision plats, the citizens of the City of Pickerington by
I initiative passed a citywide limitation for the development of property limiting it to two residential
units per acre at the election of November 5,2002. The City recognizes, as do the parties to this I
Hart ?“deal?” #15
agreement, that application of the two-unit-to-the-acre limitation would substantially impair the
express terms of the pre-annexation agreements previously entered into by the City and would
substantially affect and reduce the right of the Private Developers and owners to develop property
under approved plans and plats entered into before November 5, 2002. The parties hereto
recognize that previous commitments made before November 5, 2002 must be honored and
enforcement and the application of after-acquired restrictions is not reasonable under the
circumstances. The City, by adoption of the ordinance authorizing it to sign this Agreement,
makes the two-unit to the acre limitation only applicable to development plans, plats and contracts
. . after November 5, 2002. A major purpose for the 2-unit to the acre limitation was to limit the
adverse effects of development on school revenues. This purpose is fulfilled by the application of
this Agreement to the Chargeable Property by providing additional monies to the school system in
accordance with this Agreement. Should the Developers or each of them be prohibited from
developing in accordance with their contract, final development plan or final plat, or should
additional property be added to this District by owners who have pre-November 5,2002 existing
contracts, and those owners are subject to the 2 unit limitation then this Agreement shall be
deemed breached and tenninated as of the date such after acquired limita,tion is applied to pre I November 5, 2002 agreements, plans or plats. .
By That?’s illegal
To _ell with that damn BIA that PATA proved was behind the NO on Issue 17 last fall
The Development industry and their dirty puppets on the Council, Mayor?’s office, and Pickerington School Board are attempting to create zoning in this trumped up Community Authority. Office holders in the City should be thrown in jail if they vote to approve this right beside McAuliffe. Schools Board members should be put in stocks and publicly put to shame of allowing and supporting an illegal practice of creating zoning law here. How dare them. They don?’t belong with anything in our children?’s education if they lead by such poor example.
Hart ?“deal?” #14
The parties hereto recognize that the City has entered into contracts with one or more of the
Private Developers or owners, which contracts include pre-annexation agreements entered into
I
prior to November 5,2002. In addition, the City has rezoned property owned by one or more of the
Private Developers or owners approving final development plans and subdivision plats prior to
November 5, 2002. Prior to November 5, 2002, there were no density limitations applicable to
such developments other than as were determined by the City Zoning Code as it existed prior to
November 5, 2002. After the City entered into the pre-annexation agreements, approved final
development plans and/or final subdivision plats, the citizens of the City of Pickerington by
I initiative passed a citywide limitation for the development of property limiting it to two residential
units per acre at the election of November 5,2002. The City recognizes, as do the parties to this I
Hart ?“deal?” #15
agreement, that application of the two-unit-to-the-acre limitation would substantially impair the
express terms of the pre-annexation agreements previously entered into by the City and would
substantially affect and reduce the right of the Private Developers and owners to develop property
under approved plans and plats entered into before November 5, 2002. The parties hereto
recognize that previous commitments made before November 5, 2002 must be honored and
enforcement and the application of after-acquired restrictions is not reasonable under the
circumstances. The City, by adoption of the ordinance authorizing it to sign this Agreement,
makes the two-unit to the acre limitation only applicable to development plans, plats and contracts
. . after November 5, 2002. A major purpose for the 2-unit to the acre limitation was to limit the
adverse effects of development on school revenues. This purpose is fulfilled by the application of
this Agreement to the Chargeable Property by providing additional monies to the school system in
accordance with this Agreement. Should the Developers or each of them be prohibited from
developing in accordance with their contract, final development plan or final plat, or should
additional property be added to this District by owners who have pre-November 5,2002 existing
contracts, and those owners are subject to the 2 unit limitation then this Agreement shall be
deemed breached and tenninated as of the date such after acquired limita,tion is applied to pre I November 5, 2002 agreements, plans or plats. .
By That?’s illegal
