Quite a bashing of the PATA in the letter from Mike somebody in the recent ''Times''. I guess anyone is entitled to their opinion.
Come to think of it, I think I've seen his opinion once before. Last year, right before the overwhelming passage of the three growth control initiatives, I think I saw that same name on a piece of literature sent to me outlining why I should vote against those same initiatives.
I think that same mailing was sent by a PAC, which the PATA later discovered had only one contributer recorded...the BIA.
Seems someone is still angry. Maybe it's more than just that the PATA embarrassed him...maybe he's worried that the PATA might be insrumental in upsetting his friends control of this community.
Too Bad!
By reader
Come to think of it, I think I've seen his opinion once before. Last year, right before the overwhelming passage of the three growth control initiatives, I think I saw that same name on a piece of literature sent to me outlining why I should vote against those same initiatives.
I think that same mailing was sent by a PAC, which the PATA later discovered had only one contributer recorded...the BIA.
Seems someone is still angry. Maybe it's more than just that the PATA embarrassed him...maybe he's worried that the PATA might be insrumental in upsetting his friends control of this community.
Too Bad!
By reader