You?’ve just got to hand it to the incredible veracity of the builder/developer community in the Pickerington market place.
1. They don?’t live there but they want their way.
2. They don?’t position their businesses there but they want their way.
3. They still have their holdover City Council dupes ?– yes Bill, Doug & Mike we all know you were elected by them to represent them so don?’t even pretend otherwise.
4. They still pull the strings of the City Law Director. A position that has done all but give this City to the developers through Ordinances, Resolutions, Referendum & Initiative opposition and least we forget the all important AUTHORIZATION of ?“Contracts?”.
Nah, the people of the area will sit placidly by and ?“buy?” that submitting the lawsuit on the day of the election where the developers were knowingly going to loose control of the local show was ?“neutral?”.
Nah, the court venue wasn?’t carefully selected by the developer cartel to be a Judge that doesn?’t have to go before over 90% of the Pickerington electorate for his position and conveniently is located where these developer corporations hold their office locations.
Nah, the newspapers won?’t make the connection that the law firm being used by the developers in this attempt to rest local residents decisions on zoning and growth rate issues is the same law firm defending the Fall ?’02 ?“Push Pole?” of the firm Competitive Edge. A Push Pole that attempted to alter the citizen votes of the 2 per acre issue. So, of course, the developers had no vested interest and were not a party to this potential election violation of ?’02.
Nah, the City won?’t possible be able to use the defense of the potential illegal involvement of ?“induced annexations?” within the body of the developers statements of ?“A Taking?” when the courts hear and read the evidence.
Nah, no one will be smart enough to do their own legal research on the side of defending the citizens of the City of Pickerington to review the U.S. Supreme Court rulings that moratoriums are legal.
Nah, no one will research Ohio case law that City?’s ___ NOT DEVELOPERS ___ can set zoning, growth rates, and comprehensive land use decisions.
Nah, no one will find previous Ohio case law that forbids CONTRACT ZONING.
Developers have a nice day because as you sleep tonight and every night of this case there surely won?’t be a counter suit that can AND WILL protect the citizens of this community against your wishes and desires.
By Bob Harding
1. They don?’t live there but they want their way.
2. They don?’t position their businesses there but they want their way.
3. They still have their holdover City Council dupes ?– yes Bill, Doug & Mike we all know you were elected by them to represent them so don?’t even pretend otherwise.
4. They still pull the strings of the City Law Director. A position that has done all but give this City to the developers through Ordinances, Resolutions, Referendum & Initiative opposition and least we forget the all important AUTHORIZATION of ?“Contracts?”.
Nah, the people of the area will sit placidly by and ?“buy?” that submitting the lawsuit on the day of the election where the developers were knowingly going to loose control of the local show was ?“neutral?”.
Nah, the court venue wasn?’t carefully selected by the developer cartel to be a Judge that doesn?’t have to go before over 90% of the Pickerington electorate for his position and conveniently is located where these developer corporations hold their office locations.
Nah, the newspapers won?’t make the connection that the law firm being used by the developers in this attempt to rest local residents decisions on zoning and growth rate issues is the same law firm defending the Fall ?’02 ?“Push Pole?” of the firm Competitive Edge. A Push Pole that attempted to alter the citizen votes of the 2 per acre issue. So, of course, the developers had no vested interest and were not a party to this potential election violation of ?’02.
Nah, the City won?’t possible be able to use the defense of the potential illegal involvement of ?“induced annexations?” within the body of the developers statements of ?“A Taking?” when the courts hear and read the evidence.
Nah, no one will be smart enough to do their own legal research on the side of defending the citizens of the City of Pickerington to review the U.S. Supreme Court rulings that moratoriums are legal.
Nah, no one will research Ohio case law that City?’s ___ NOT DEVELOPERS ___ can set zoning, growth rates, and comprehensive land use decisions.
Nah, no one will find previous Ohio case law that forbids CONTRACT ZONING.
Developers have a nice day because as you sleep tonight and every night of this case there surely won?’t be a counter suit that can AND WILL protect the citizens of this community against your wishes and desires.
By Bob Harding