I'm seriously asking that question:
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/03/jihadis-who-fought-us-iraq-afghanistan-now-enjoy-american-support#ixzz1HouFexF1
|
I'm seriously asking that question:
|
||
|
|
|||
|
The evidence is quite astounding that the Obumbler administration are actually enemies of the United States and are acting to thwart our country's best interests. The mainstream media is not calling them on this. They do not realize that, if successful, anything resembling a free press is doomed!:
Last year, U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and her senior staff secretly met with a select group of Muslim, Arab, and Sikh organizations. Among the mix were three organizations directly associated with an outlawed terrorist entity -- the Muslim Brotherhood, who are involved in the current uprising in Egypt. Walid Phares, director of the Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, criticized the partnership concept: "Through the so-called 'partnership' between the Jihadi-sympathizer networks and U.S. bureaucracies, the U.S. government is invaded by militant groups." Just recently, a Washington, DC-based legal group uncovered documents from the Department of Homeland Security that detail a two-day meeting on January 27 and 28, 2010, between DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano and Arab, Muslim, Sikh, and South Asian "community leaders." Judicial Watch reports they obtained documents that include a list of participating individuals and organizations in Napolitano's meeting with individuals with controversial radical ties, including: * Imad Hamad, Midwest Regional Director of the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee. According to investigative reporter Debbie Schlussel, Hamad is connected to the Marxist-Leninist terrorist group Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, and has financially supported the Islamist terrorist group Hezbollah. In a television interview in 2002 on Fox's Detroit affiliate, Hamad supported a Palestine Authority TV program that urged children to become suicide bombers, calling the program "patriotic." * Salam Al-Marayati, Founder of the Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC): According to press reports, Al-Mayarati has long been criticized for his extremist views and statements. In 1999 former House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-MO) withdrew his nomination of Al-Mayarati to the National Commission on Terrorism because of Al-Mayarati's extremist politics. Al-Marayati once said, "When Patrick Henry said, 'Give me liberty or give me death,' that statement epitomized Jihad [Islamic holy war]." One of the organizations that attended the meeting was the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), which was created by members of the Muslim Brotherhood. ISNA was named in 2007 by the U.S. Department of Justice as an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terror trial. The group was identified as a major financier of overseas Islamic terrorist organizations, particularly Hamas. The Muslim Brotherhood is the ideological foundation for today's terrorist organizations in the Islamic world. Founded in 1928, it is the oldest Islamic fundamentalist political group in modern times. Originally called the Society of the Muslim Brothers, today it is a big supporter of Hamas and Hezbollah and considered the inspirational "father" of al-Qaeda. In addition to the attendee list and biographies, the documents also included internal DHS email correspondence, talking points for Secretary Napolitano and a meeting agenda." |
||
|
The evidence is quite astounding that the Obumbler administration are actually enemies of the United States and are acting to thwart our country's best interests. The mainstream media is not calling them on this. They do not realize that, if successful, anything resembling a free press is doomed!:
|
||
|
It's not about "this guy", if you are referring to Kouri. It's about the reported secret meeting of Napolitano with members of the Muslim Brotherhood. That checks out as true fact. I know you'd like it to be about the messenger; but it's really about the message. |