POINT OF VEIW

SO WHAT IS YOUR TAKE ON THE FIRST AMENDMENT. HERE IT IS SO EXPLAND WHAT YOU MEAN . PLEASE SO I CAN SEE THINGS FROM YOUR POINT OF VEIW OR CAN I HAVE MY OWN POINT OF VEIW
Freedom of Expression

It is often said that one of the rights protected by the 1st Amendment is the freedom of expression. This site, in fact, uses that term in its quick description of the amendment: ''Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression.'' But ''expression'' is not used in the amendment at all. This term has come to be used as a shorthand, a term of art, for three of the freedoms that are explicitly protected: speech, petition, and assembly. While the use of ''freedom of expression'' is ubiquitous in this area of 1st Amendment study, it is important to note exactly what ''freedom of expression'' refers to - let this be such a note.
Thanks to baf for the idea.

(Absolute) Freedom of Speech and Press

The Constitution does protect the freedom of speech of every citizen, and even of non-citizens ?— but only from restriction by the Congress (and, by virtue of the 14th Amendment, by state legislatures, too). There are plenty of other places where you could speak but where speech can and is suppressed. For example, freedom of speech can be and often is restricted in a work place, for example: employers can restrict your right to speak in the work place about politics, about religion, about legal issues, even about Desperate Housewives. The same restrictions that apply to the government do not apply to private persons, employers, or establishments. For another example, the government could not prohibit the sale of any newspaper lest it breech the freedom of the press. No newsstand, however, must carry every paper against its owners' wishes.
Thanks to Dave Pullin for the idea.

.AS A HOME OWNER YEAH BUT AS THE WEB MATER NO !!

LIES, LIES, LIES

You remember incorrectly! Jack was not the original ACC guy. It was Ruben who was the original ACC guy. And it was also Ruben who asked a homeowner to meet him at the office to discuss the big ass shed. It was a long time ago and a lot of people don't remember or were not homeowners yet, but I was. I was here when Tim was active with the committees and I was here when Richard was on the board. I thought it was going to get better when Richard left. But I was wrong...

LIES WHERE

YEAH YOU ARE RIGHT RICHARD WAS . SO I SAY SORRY FOR THAT. BUT I DONT SEE ANY STEPPING UP TO HELP DO ANYTHING. BUT THE SAME PEOPLE DO HELP WHEN NEED. AND NO ONE ELSE DOES.SO IF RUBEN WANT TO MEET WITH THE PARTIES WHO WAS INVOLED TO SOLVE THE ISSUE , AND TO PUT IT TO REST , SO BE IT , THEN MAYBE THINGS WOULD NOT BE AS BAD AS THEY ARE NOW, WHO KNOWS

ACC's

Once again someone running their mouth without know a damn thing. No , I was never the ACC chairman, no I did not approve everything. I only approved 3 ACC
's and they were by the covenants. I don't have to save my ass. I have done nothing wrong, other than point out the failings of our BOD's.