Does any body know why a wood fence was put up long the Enclave? (I have a good idea). The fence is already starting to sag and look really bad. This was a cheesy way for the developer to save money and piss on the foot of the owners in the Enclave. We paid a premium to live in these homes. The Arbor neighborhood builder/Developer seem to get it right over there. They have a solid wall all along the Parkway.
This never made sense, and ProComm has always been evasive on this issue and never answered to us, why and how they allowed this to happen. ProComm, Juanita Seekins and Lee Tompkins completely looked the other way on this.
What I know.
Early 2006 construction the wood fence for phase III of the Enclave was started. At that time the developer owned most of the seats on the board. This gave the developer majority and the power at that time to control and fire ProComm. That's a logical reason as to why ProComm did nothing and said nothing, effectively and knowingly ruining on our neighborhood's look from Sonoma Parkway for years to come.
Q. Why didn't ProComm protect the integrity of our neighborhood and mandate that the fence be a solid wall like everywhere else?
A. They were in the developer's pocket and were not about to force him spend more of his $$$. He probably would have terminated their contract.
Q. Wasn't ProComm hired to protect the integrity of our neighborhoods?
A. Yes but, assuring and continuing their service contract outweighs what's right or important like, effectively do their job. (Thus keeping a wood fence from clashing with everything else)
I hear that developer has moved on and probably does not have, or, is in the process of relinquishing the majority rule. (Also it's clamp on the ProComm).
I think ProComm should dip into their profits from the hundreds of neighborhoods they have contracts with and pay for a solid wall and restore the integrity of the whole area.
Wouldn't you agree......................................