Posted with approval.
------------------
Commissioner Sonleitner:
Thanks for staying until the end of the CAMPO meeting at the LBJ library, participating in my playful ''stretching exercise'' and listening to my comments from the microphone delivered a few minutes before adjournment. I waited until the end in order to listen to the full presentation and all the other speakers before addressing the board. I remain willing to listen to, examine with an open mind, and to comment on plans and information put forth by TxDoT on the toll roads issue.
As I stated last evening, however, the presentation by Mr. Daigh that I have now twice witnessed is anything but a plan, in that it is entirely lacking in the details that should have been supplied with it. As I also stated, I was shocked to find out that traffic and revenue studies had not been done prior to putting this proposal together. When Mr. Daigh admitted this in response to a question from a member of the audience I was incredulous that anyone in such a position would propose borrowing $400Mm in bond money before having done, then solicited and received comments upon, all the necessary research. That is shameful. Equally appalling was the initial suggestion that the TxDoT proposal that you were being asked to vote upon was a fully-integrated, cohesive package. You were told (until Mr. Daigh modified his stance in response to a direct, pointed question from Senator Barrientos) that the ''plan'' was an all-or-nothing proposal which could not work if it were not approved without modification.
TxDoT should be severely chastized for such a performance. Not only did it result in a waste of your time and that of the other CAMPO board members, it illustrated to the public attendees the apparent inability of TxDoT planners to understand and adhere to the quaint idea of being responsible for their work. How can TxDoT officials be held accountable for the ultimate success or failure of their multi-billion dollar projects when they are not even required to support the premises and conclusions in their proposals with actual data derived from reliable, published sources? TxDoT's own literature states that traffic and revenue estimates are absolutely necessary for putting together a tollroad feasibility study (which one might assume would be a prerequisite to actually proposing a plan for implementation of such a system of toll roads and a request for $400Mm in bond money to begin the work). You were given neither the traffic counts at the various proposed toll points nor the estimated revenues they anticipate collecting at any of them. (When queried on specifics, TxDoT won't even publicly say how much the proposed tolls for a family car are going to be for the privilege of using roads that, in many cases, have already been funded through collected tax revenues.) The worst part of this charade is that they know full well that these studies must be done and yet they have either failed to follow their own guidelines, or they have the information (a suspicion that more than one CAMPO member has confided to me privately) but are unwilling to publish it. That would fly in the face of their stated policy ''to provide the public with the fullest possible access to public information.'' See http://www.dot.state.tx.us/PIO/openrecords.htm . It would also be illegal. Either way, we are all left to wonder how it is that they chose the particular roads and tolling locations that they did in such an alleged vacuum of information.
On the issue of vacuums, I will also report that although I requested a copy of the power point presentation that Mr. Daigh used at Kiker (and also at the CAMPO meeting last night) so that I could better prepare comments for the CAMPO board, none was ever supplied. Could you please intercede on my behalf and get me a copy? Thanks in advance.
Bill Gammon
www.williamgammon.com
------------------
Commissioner Sonleitner:
Thanks for staying until the end of the CAMPO meeting at the LBJ library, participating in my playful ''stretching exercise'' and listening to my comments from the microphone delivered a few minutes before adjournment. I waited until the end in order to listen to the full presentation and all the other speakers before addressing the board. I remain willing to listen to, examine with an open mind, and to comment on plans and information put forth by TxDoT on the toll roads issue.
As I stated last evening, however, the presentation by Mr. Daigh that I have now twice witnessed is anything but a plan, in that it is entirely lacking in the details that should have been supplied with it. As I also stated, I was shocked to find out that traffic and revenue studies had not been done prior to putting this proposal together. When Mr. Daigh admitted this in response to a question from a member of the audience I was incredulous that anyone in such a position would propose borrowing $400Mm in bond money before having done, then solicited and received comments upon, all the necessary research. That is shameful. Equally appalling was the initial suggestion that the TxDoT proposal that you were being asked to vote upon was a fully-integrated, cohesive package. You were told (until Mr. Daigh modified his stance in response to a direct, pointed question from Senator Barrientos) that the ''plan'' was an all-or-nothing proposal which could not work if it were not approved without modification.
TxDoT should be severely chastized for such a performance. Not only did it result in a waste of your time and that of the other CAMPO board members, it illustrated to the public attendees the apparent inability of TxDoT planners to understand and adhere to the quaint idea of being responsible for their work. How can TxDoT officials be held accountable for the ultimate success or failure of their multi-billion dollar projects when they are not even required to support the premises and conclusions in their proposals with actual data derived from reliable, published sources? TxDoT's own literature states that traffic and revenue estimates are absolutely necessary for putting together a tollroad feasibility study (which one might assume would be a prerequisite to actually proposing a plan for implementation of such a system of toll roads and a request for $400Mm in bond money to begin the work). You were given neither the traffic counts at the various proposed toll points nor the estimated revenues they anticipate collecting at any of them. (When queried on specifics, TxDoT won't even publicly say how much the proposed tolls for a family car are going to be for the privilege of using roads that, in many cases, have already been funded through collected tax revenues.) The worst part of this charade is that they know full well that these studies must be done and yet they have either failed to follow their own guidelines, or they have the information (a suspicion that more than one CAMPO member has confided to me privately) but are unwilling to publish it. That would fly in the face of their stated policy ''to provide the public with the fullest possible access to public information.'' See http://www.dot.state.tx.us/PIO/openrecords.htm . It would also be illegal. Either way, we are all left to wonder how it is that they chose the particular roads and tolling locations that they did in such an alleged vacuum of information.
On the issue of vacuums, I will also report that although I requested a copy of the power point presentation that Mr. Daigh used at Kiker (and also at the CAMPO meeting last night) so that I could better prepare comments for the CAMPO board, none was ever supplied. Could you please intercede on my behalf and get me a copy? Thanks in advance.
Bill Gammon
www.williamgammon.com