At the `informal' HEB/Stratus meeting
Jim Oreilly rigidly controlled the format.
The meeting was billed as an `informal discussion'. Instead it was a scripted
presentation with no opportunity for
neighbor input.
I was astonished when our written questions
were collected and Jim Oreilly then stated
they would be answered at some future date.
Tonight I see that www.circlecranch.com has the questions and answers from the
HEB/Stratus meeting. And strangely
enough, not all of my questions are listed there!
I asked (in writing) what would Stratus do if the zoning change request was denied. That question is absent from
www.circlec.com.
I see a grand total of seven questions,
and only six of them are answered.
Given a crowd of 60 people I'm very
surprised that there were only seven
questions posed.
The HEB/Stratus meeting was a masterpiece of cynical manipulation.
How can the BOD claim the meeting was an
informal discussion when we were not allowed time to discuss anything?
Quentin
Jim Oreilly rigidly controlled the format.
The meeting was billed as an `informal discussion'. Instead it was a scripted
presentation with no opportunity for
neighbor input.
I was astonished when our written questions
were collected and Jim Oreilly then stated
they would be answered at some future date.
Tonight I see that www.circlecranch.com has the questions and answers from the
HEB/Stratus meeting. And strangely
enough, not all of my questions are listed there!
I asked (in writing) what would Stratus do if the zoning change request was denied. That question is absent from
www.circlec.com.
I see a grand total of seven questions,
and only six of them are answered.
Given a crowd of 60 people I'm very
surprised that there were only seven
questions posed.
The HEB/Stratus meeting was a masterpiece of cynical manipulation.
How can the BOD claim the meeting was an
informal discussion when we were not allowed time to discuss anything?
Quentin