CCHOA Legal Issues Settled
The Legal issues between CCHOA and William Gammon were settled by mediation this week. As you'll see, William Gammon will not be paying CCHOA legal fees. Shouldn't the BOD pay that bill with their personal funds? This is the complete ''Memorandum of Understanding'' between CCHOA and William Gammon signed December 2, 2003.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
As a result of mediation conducted on December 2, 2003, William B. Gammon, (Bill), and Circle C Homeowners Association, Inc. (CCHOA), Steven P. Bartlett (Steve), Ken Rigsbee (Ken), and Jim O'Reilly (Jim) have agreed to resolve all issues in dispute between them in the litigation now pending as cause number GN 300,975 in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, on the following terms and conditions:
1. The continuation of the 2003 annual meeting of CCHOA will be held no earlier than January 22 and no later than February 7, 2004. Notice of the meeting will be delivered not later than January 15, 2004. That meeting will be conducted in accordance with Roberts Rules of Order. The President of CCHOA will initially preside at the meeting.
2. The agenda for that meeting will include, among other things:
First item of business: by-law amendments on the following topics:
a. whether the by-laws should be amended to provide that annual meetings should be conducted by someone other than the President of CCHOA, and if so who, and how that person is selected;
b. whether the by-laws should be amended to increase the size of the board of directors and, if so, to what size and for what terms;
c. whether the by-laws should be amended to alter the method for making nominations to the board of directors;
d. whether the by-laws should be amended to specify the form for proxies;
e. whether the by-laws should be amended to provide for cumulative voting;
f. whether the by-laws should be amended to specify that the annual meeting will be conducted pursuant to Roberts Rules of Order;
g. whether the by-laws should be amended to require some percentage other than 25% of the qualified voters to sign a petition for a special meeting;
Second item of business: the election of a director for the position currently held by Steven P. Bartlett.
Third item of business: other business.
3. Bill agrees not to reassert for himself, or as an attorney for another, any claim which has been raised in this litigation.
4. Each party will execute a complete release of any and all claims against all opposing parties which have been made or which could have been made in this litigation. The release will be drafted by the attorney for CCHOA. It will then be delivered to Bill for approval as to form, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Once approved, the release will be signed by each party.
5. If either party fails to abide by the obligations set out in this agreement, then the release, as to the breaching party, shall be null and void.
6. This agreement may be entered as a Rule 11 agreement. Each party agrees to non-suit all unadjudicated claims which are not the subject of a prior order in this case. The parties agree to take all steps necessary to secure a final judgment reflecting the terms of all prior orders in this case.
The Legal issues between CCHOA and William Gammon were settled by mediation this week. As you'll see, William Gammon will not be paying CCHOA legal fees. Shouldn't the BOD pay that bill with their personal funds? This is the complete ''Memorandum of Understanding'' between CCHOA and William Gammon signed December 2, 2003.
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
As a result of mediation conducted on December 2, 2003, William B. Gammon, (Bill), and Circle C Homeowners Association, Inc. (CCHOA), Steven P. Bartlett (Steve), Ken Rigsbee (Ken), and Jim O'Reilly (Jim) have agreed to resolve all issues in dispute between them in the litigation now pending as cause number GN 300,975 in the 200th Judicial District Court of Travis County, Texas, on the following terms and conditions:
1. The continuation of the 2003 annual meeting of CCHOA will be held no earlier than January 22 and no later than February 7, 2004. Notice of the meeting will be delivered not later than January 15, 2004. That meeting will be conducted in accordance with Roberts Rules of Order. The President of CCHOA will initially preside at the meeting.
2. The agenda for that meeting will include, among other things:
First item of business: by-law amendments on the following topics:
a. whether the by-laws should be amended to provide that annual meetings should be conducted by someone other than the President of CCHOA, and if so who, and how that person is selected;
b. whether the by-laws should be amended to increase the size of the board of directors and, if so, to what size and for what terms;
c. whether the by-laws should be amended to alter the method for making nominations to the board of directors;
d. whether the by-laws should be amended to specify the form for proxies;
e. whether the by-laws should be amended to provide for cumulative voting;
f. whether the by-laws should be amended to specify that the annual meeting will be conducted pursuant to Roberts Rules of Order;
g. whether the by-laws should be amended to require some percentage other than 25% of the qualified voters to sign a petition for a special meeting;
Second item of business: the election of a director for the position currently held by Steven P. Bartlett.
Third item of business: other business.
3. Bill agrees not to reassert for himself, or as an attorney for another, any claim which has been raised in this litigation.
4. Each party will execute a complete release of any and all claims against all opposing parties which have been made or which could have been made in this litigation. The release will be drafted by the attorney for CCHOA. It will then be delivered to Bill for approval as to form, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Once approved, the release will be signed by each party.
5. If either party fails to abide by the obligations set out in this agreement, then the release, as to the breaching party, shall be null and void.
6. This agreement may be entered as a Rule 11 agreement. Each party agrees to non-suit all unadjudicated claims which are not the subject of a prior order in this case. The parties agree to take all steps necessary to secure a final judgment reflecting the terms of all prior orders in this case.