Claims against the officers

Ms. White, I will say I have no fears related to the ''claims'' I listed in my posting. They are in full view for anyone who wants to look at them. The charges for bad checks went without resolution until a bench warrant was served; it appears that the defendant could not be located and the court played a trump card with the warrant. The numerous traffic violations, the menacing charge, the history on prior officers . . . it shows that the village attracts quality in their applicants. Maybe Jim Baker needs a job? I hear the new ministry isn't very successful . . .

Ms. White

>>Andy Hawk said on Sept. 1, 2003, I saw myself throw it in the dumpster, I already had it and was throwing it away, there was no perp. I have burnt guns, drugs, bikes, license plates, wrenches, tire irons and many other things. What is the big deal?''

I thought the big deal was ''destroying evidence !!!

In reply to the above statement, what you thought was and is wrong. You want to pretend that some sort of illegal thing was going on. Nothing could be further from the truth. I stated then and will state again you have no idea of the proper handling of evidence no longer needed. Check out the ORC some time and maybe become enlightened on the subject.

Andy

Ms. White

>>Linda Stoner wrote a letter to me that she could not find any request to destroy records or evidence during Hawk and Consolo's tenure.

Who gave either of them permission to destroy anything?

First of all who was Stoner but a little tin dictator wannabe? Second it is painfully obviously that you have no clue about no longer needed evidence. As for who gives permission it is a Judge.

It would be wise for you to know at least part of the facts before you go around impugning others with your uninformed rhetoric.

Andy

GOOD !

Annonymous, Get the people who have told of the deplorable conduct of the officers to speak publicly.

Valleyview always scrapes the bottom of the barrel whan hiring employees and some elected officials.

There are some I voted for because I believed what they said. I did not stay quiet. I tried to get them removed. The problem is that others used this against me, no matter what you try to do.

Paul Parrish wanted Raylene out but lied about what she did and he said and goes on and on about me being her ''friend''. Politics is a very good way to find out who friends are. These people count on you not coming to meetings to see what really went on. They threatened me said libeled me because I spoke openly.

My reason for not taking them to court is because I don't have money for an attorney. Their reason for not suing me is that they don't want the truth to come out.

Haven't the residents wondered why I have not been sued? Watkins said I stole money. It was said on this site that I took bribes.

Would you want a person who stole to be elected to office and stay there by telling people that someone else did it? Or someone who has conned family and friends?

A lot of people have told me of their experiences and those of others. You would know them all. I will have to use John Chapman's statement, ''Those who know aren't talking.'' What a shame.