Town of Braintree

More Republicans With Sex Lives

More Republicans Satisfied With Sex Lives Than Democrats
New ' Sex Survey Reveals That More Republicans (56%) Are Very Satisfied With Their Sex Lives Than Democrats (47%) American Sex Lives 2004, a new sex poll conducted in conjunction with the Polling Unit, is among the most comprehensive surveys of its kind in decades and establishes a new, detailed picture of sex attitudes and behavior in America today.
The full results of this wide-ranging sex poll will be presented during a live, hour long event airing Thursday, Oct. 21

The sex poll answers many provocative questions that we have all wondered about, but have never dared to ask, including: how many Americans describe themselves as sexually ''traditional'' or ''adventurous''; how often are Americans having sex; what are the sex habits of cheaters; and who is cheating with their co-worker and who is cheating in the workplace.
The poll analysis includes a breakdown by many subgroups, including region, age and even political party affiliation, which is the topic of results released today:
Of those involved in a committed relationship,

who is very satisfied with their relationship? Republicans -- 87 percent; Democrats -- 76 percent
Who is very satisfied with their sex life? Republicans -- 56 percent; Democrats -- 47 percent
The poll analysis also reveals who has worn something
sexy to enhance their sex life: Republicans -- 72 percent; Democrats -- 62 percent
When asked whether they had
ever faked an orgasm, more Democrats (33 percent) than Republicans (26 percent) said they had.

Among the factors that impact the survey results is that more men identify themselves as Republicans and men are more likely to say they are sexually satisfied and enjoy sex ''a great deal.'' Also, Democrats are more likely to be women; and the poll results show that women are more likely to fake orgasms.

The American Sex Lives 2004 survey was conducted by telephone August 2-9, 2004, among a random, anonymous, national sample of adults 18-99 years old. The results have a 2.5-point error margin for all respondents; as in any poll, sampling error is higher for subgroups.


By Sexey RepublicansSatisfied With

Become A Sexy Republician

Have a better sex life!Become a Republician,We are better in bed than
those cold indifferent Demo's!

Premature release is non existant on the conservative side due to more
self assurance and better looks!

The pressure to improve and restrain themself is an liberal hallmark!

Improve your life and your relationships with woman join the party of manhood,the Republicians!

Just look at Kerry he looks like a wimp in action!

By Sexey RepublicansSatisfy Better

These global con artists U.N.


The big news is that the U.N. has flunked ''the global test. To find that ''the global community'' is made up of a bunch of crooks, that ''the global test'' is a racket, and that John Kerry is either utterly na?¯ve or in cahoots with these global con artists is something that's just too unfit to think about, let alone broadcast to the masses, especially right before election day.

The whole shady story is in the Duelfer report. what the report from the CIA's Iraq Survey Group shows is that Saddam Hussein played the United Nations like a fiddle.

To get there, Saddam set up an epic bribery scheme that put three of the five permanent members of the UN Security Council in his pocket.

''It's pretty clear that the Iraqi strategy and tactics of dividing the Security Council were having a fair amount of success,'' said Charles Duelfer, the chief of the Iraq Survey Group, in public testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee. ''Iraq was within striking distance of a de facto end to the sanctions regime.''
.
Especially targeted by Saddam were three veto-wielding members of the Security Council -- Russia, France, and China.

The alleged beneficiaries identified by the Survey Group included individuals with close ties to Russian President Vladimir Putin, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan, and French President Jacques Chirac, i.e., Russian politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky, retired UN Oil-for-Food director Benon Sevan, and former French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua.

France went further, assuring Saddam that it would use its veto in the Security Council to prevent any invasion.

Reconstituting his WMD programs. As described by New York Times columnist David Brooks: ''With sanctions weakening and money flowing, Saddam rebuilt his strength. He contacted WMD scientists in Russia, Belarus, Bulgaria and elsewhere to enhance his technical knowledge base. He increased the funds for his nuclear scientists.

Iraqi nuclear scientist Mahdi Obeidi, writing in the New York Times on September 26, stated that ''our nuclear program could have been reinstituted at the snap of Saddam Hussein's fingers. Iraqi scientists had the knowledge and the designs needed to jumpstart the program if necessary.'' Additionally, Duelfer reports that Saddam ''clearly intended to reconstitute long-range delivery systems'' for missiles with strike capacities in excess of 600 miles.

The problem for John Kerry? It seems increasingly far-fetched to say that Saddam wasn't a threat, or that we're the ones running a ''coalition of the bribed,'' or that U.S. moves should pass a ''global test.''






By The global test. To find crook

i'm here to help


more food for thought.consider this
prerequisite reading.








bush vs. kerry

Aug 31, 2004
i need some help here.there are alot of intelligent people who post opinions on this site so maybe a pro/ con list for both candidates will help me make my mind up who i should vote for in november.i am an unenrolled voter trying to figure out who should lead our country for the next four years- george w. bush or john f. kerry
i am white middle class blue collar.my life has not changed in the last four years. i cried at the tragedy of 9/11
but i see no resolution in sight.the economy that was flat when bush took office still is flat four years later.
i pay almost 2.00/gallon for gas and 1.70/gallon for heating oil and that is not a campaign issue.religion and politics have always been in conflict
and nothing that i have seen or heard
leads me to believe that it will ever
change.bush is not a veteran and neither was clinton.bush was a one term
governor and his job prior to that was owning a baseball team. a war that ended thirty years ago is only relevent
to those who fought and died for OUR FREEDOM. thank you all for that.even when i disagree i acknowledge your sacrifice and our freedom of speech-even when it means we agree to dis agree.it would not exist without this
unselfish service which ensures our
way of life. i need to know what kerry
is and what he stands for.the only thing i know for certain is he served and bush did not. they both are children of wealth.neither HAD to serve.kerry chose to. at some point a voter has to decide for him/herself if serving in the military actively is a prerequisite to the ability to be president.a politician by nature will always yield when their stance on any
issue leaves them bereft of understanding or allies.four years later i am still waiting to here the details for george walker bush's plan
to cure the economy;a strategy to dispel our never ending fears of another terrorist event and a cogent thought process toward leading the people of our nation in the same direction instead of splitting us apart
along party/race/class/religious lines.
john kerry has a plan but i be damned
if i know how he'll pull it off nevermind paying or explaining it so we'll be able to tell if it's what we wanted in the first place...hmmm,you
know,this is familiar.didn't george shovel the same crap on all of us four years ago? and we bought it.these two
candidates have more in common than i thought.image that

-By townie homeowner



By townie home owner