IGA with Boulder re open space
After seeing previous comments on this IGA (by Resolution 193-98 on 10/13/98), which DID NOT allow for public input or questions, I have to add a little.
The IGA provided for BF(Broomfield) to pay its proportionate share (74%) of the Boulder County's (BC's) acquisition costs for 12 properties adjacent to BF borders (a total of 1327.96 acres). As such, BF will pay for the equivalent of LESS THAN 1000 ACRES.
Yet, in typical BF fashion, BF somehow got BC to agree to let BF count all BC open space south of Baseline(Highway 7)and east of Highway 93, which is just less than 6000 acres, and "to include such open space properties in the open space calculations for Broomfield's Master Plan. Some of the property BF can count is north & west of Louisville or west of Superior. Is this shady or what?
Also, in the years 1994 through 1997, BC received $1.522 Million in open space sales tax from BF (that's $380,000 per year). So why did they settle for getting only $250,000 per year in the future?
And, lastly BC agreed not to oppose Broomfield County. I have a feeling this is all that BF really wanted in the first place.
Overall, it seems that BC came out on the short end of this IGA. Why would they agree to this? Perhaps they would do anything to get BF out of their hair and I don't think I blame them.
By BRF2