Thank you. I will take that under advisement, but don't yous think he has some interesting things to offer. Funny anyway.
|
Thank you. I will take that under advisement, but don't yous think he has some interesting things to offer. Funny anyway. |
|
|
|
||
|
Mobay, You can hang on to your theories for as long as you want, but the ASCE (American Society of Civil Engineers) contains as members the vast majority of registered, licensed structural engineers in the nation. And many throughout the world. They have assigned the best of the best to investigate these things. There is no better authority. I have yet to hear of or see a single member dispute their findings. And I don't think you will. If they did they would in all likelyhood be ousted for being incompetent because there is no basis for it. Their only motive I can thing of would be publicity or more correctly notoriety. Which I think is the motive of most of the folks you have on film. Why do you insist on taking the word of a single petroleum engineer? He probably isn't even aware of the sophisticated programs structural engineers have access to much understand them. So the controlled demolition of the buildings (which has a long history) is a theory and the ONLY building in history to fall due to fire is the fact!!!!
here we have the gulf of tonkin where McNamara admits it did not happen. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to aid in maintaining global dominance.
what about global warming scientist admit to cooking the books and here is a NIST engineer that denies molten steel at ground zero, your scientist denies a fact!
The countdown to demolition of the world trade center building 7 was heard by many first responders and medics.
There is ample evidence, from both witnesses and recordings, of explosions associated with the destruction of World Trade Center Building 7 (WTC 7). NIST sidestepped investigating explosions and explosives by setting up an artificially high threshold of interest. They swept aside any testimony or recordings of explosions that would not register 130-140 dB one kilometer away. They established this criterion using RDX (one of the loudest explosives) in a scenario that produced a far higher sound level than other possible uses of explosives to bring down the building. Then they turned around and used sound level as the sole criterion for deciding whether the use of explosives was a credible hypothesis. By this maneuver, they sidestepped investigating the testimony of explosives or possible evidence of explosive residues. This is just one more instance of fraudulent behavior on the part of the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center disaster.
micheal hess witness to WTC7 explosions he was trapped with jennings
NYFD Firefighters say they heard explosions and believe the towers were brought down by high-explosives. Radio recordings show the NYFD Firefighters say they heard explosions and believe the towers were brought down by high-explosives. Radio recordings show the firefighters in the towers saying there were only two small pockets of fire and should be able to knock it out with two lines. But then the buildings came down...it wasn't the small fires in the towers, it was high-explosives!
29 Structural & Civil Engineers Cite Evidence for Controlled Explosive Demolition in Collapses of All 3 WTC High-Rises on 9/11 AE911Truth.org here is the actual site. Read it from their own PENAC document. Pay special attention to the section entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force" page 50 and the top of page 51, where it states we need a new Pearl Harbor attack to aid in maintaining global dominance.
http://www.newamericancentury.org/Rebuil… 118 Witnesses:
The Firefighters Testimony to Explosions in the Twin Towers. Daniel Rivera, South Tower: Then thats when I kept on walking close to the south tower and thats when that building collapsed. Q. How did you know that it was coming down? A. That noise. It was a noise. Q. What did you hear? What did you see? A. It was a frigging noise. At first I thought it was--do you ever see professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear pop, pop, pop, pop, pop? Thats exactly what--because I thought it was that. When I heard that frigging noise, thats when I saw the building coming down. The Body of Evidence According to Jim Dwyer of the New York Times, the FDNY oral histories were originally gathered on the order of Thomas Von Essen, the city fire commissioner on Sept. 11, who said he wanted to preserve those accounts before they became reshaped by a collective memory.The oral histories constitute about 12,000 pages of testimony by 503 FDNY firefighters, emergency medical technicians and paramedics collected from early October, 2001 to late January, 2002. Mr. Von Essens prophetic act has given us a remarkably rich body of narrative material. Initially, the city of New York refused to release this material, but after a lawsuit by the New York Times and some of the 9/11 victims families the city was ordered to release them. The New York Times then posted them on its internet site, where they have been available (with some deletions) to the public since August, 2005. Most interviewees appear to have given their testimony spontaneously, although some obviously read from a report they had written. For the most part, interviewees appear to have been given the opportunity to structure their narratives as they wished. As we know, the New York firefighters were used by the U.S. government after 9/11 as symbols of heroism, but there are in this collection very few heroic narratives. Many accounts are actually structured as anti-heroic narratives--the firefighters arrive to save people and end up running for their lives as the Towers collapse. Others are outright chaos narratives, where people mill around hopelessly with no plan and where their skills are useless. I find many of the stories powerfully told, with vulnerability and humanity. Patriotism is no more than an occasional flash in these accounts, and there are extremely few witnesses who try to use their experiences to advance the U.S. governments war on terror. Despite variations in the stories, as a body of narrative the collection gives prominence to five perceptions that were shocking to the witnesses: (1) the perception of the Towers burning; (2) the perception of body parts littering the streets as the firefighters and medics arrive on the scene; (3) the perception of people in the Towers leaping to their deaths; (4) the perception of the Towers collapsing, and, especially, the perception of the initiation of these collapses; (5) the perception of, and entrapment in, the cloud of pulverized building flowing down the streets after the collapses. It is the fourth of these shocking perceptions that is the focus of the present study. Full Graeme MacQueen Paper: http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_WorldTrade... William Rodriguez, Last person in NORTH TOWER admits BOMBS in Tower! he states that bombs were going off in the north tower before planes hits any buildings
local New York CBS affiliate WCBS coverage of the George Washington Bridge Incident ..... September 11th 2001. Story (NEW YORK POST) www.nypost.com/news/regionalnews/ September 13, 2001 -- Three men who celebrated as the Twin Towers crumbled are facing deportation, The Post has learned. The men, described as illegal immigrants from the Middle East, were arrested Tuesday afternoon in a white Chevy van near the Meadowlands based on a tip from witnesses who saw them "cheering" and "jumping up and down" in Liberty State Park after the attack, a source said. Witnesses took the plate number and the FBI sent out an alert to area cops, reading: "Vehicle possibly related to New York terrorist attack . . . Three individuals with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent explosion." Port Authority cops nabbed the three as they drove along Route 3 in East Rutherford in the van, which had the words "Urban Moving Systems" painted on it. After grilling the men and searching the van in vain for explosives, the FBI turned the men over to the Immigration and Naturalization Service for deportation. The feds declined to release the men's identities or nationalities. "The agency has decided it will not make any comments about this at this time," said INS spokesman Kerry Gill. Officials at "Urban Moving" claimed to be unaware of what had happened
|
|
|
Dummen. Was ist mit dem fremden auto Entführungen und imprägnierungen?
Do everybody a favor here and translate this into English and then tell us why you said it. |
|
|
"Everybody"?
|