Muscatine

Who Has Done More?

Posted in: Muscatine
  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

In an article by Cynthia Beaudette is the following:

 

Seventy-three percent of sulfur dioxide emissions come from fossil fuel combustion at power plants, according to the EPA, with up to 20 percent coming from other industrial facilities

 

Those percentages are probably good for the whole country but that doesn't mean they are good for Muscatine.

 

This article was printed in both the Muscatine Journal and the Quad City Times.

 

The article states that high levels of sulfur dioxide have been an ongoing problem in Muscatine.

 

True.

 

So Republican, perhaps your question should be who is creating the air quality problems in Muscatine. If it is the sulfur dioxide problem that the EPA terms a 'health hazard', then who burns fossil fuels that create that problem? Is it MPW or GPC? Is GPC now burning coal?


Yes, GPC is burning coal.   Have been for ages.   If you look at north latitude 41 deg 23' 46.61" and west longitude 91 deg 03' 30.12" you will be directly over their distributions tower at the end of their coal conveyor from their barge unloader.

Or it is at coordinates 2310275.88   518111.58 if you use MAGIC.

 

The coal pile is only somewhat smaller than that at MPW.

 

You can also see one of their chimneys at north 41deg 23' 57.10 amd west 91 deg 03' 39.54".   Another chimney is approximately 110 ft north east of this.

 

You also might wish to know that MPW has a scrubber on their largest unit which removes sulfur dioxide from the flue gas.   I'm fairly certain GPC does not.

 

 

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

 

If MPW is doing more to reduce the pollution in Muscatine as you infer and msmal claims - how is it that it appears that MPW is the greatest polluter?

 

It doesn't appear that way if you consider all the facts.

 

Can that be so when you so want to crucify GPC? After all, it is MPW that burns fossil fuels, not GPC.

 

Wrong, I covered this elsewhere.

If GPC is crucified, they've done it to themselves.

 

But I presume you think like a politcian - no longer in office but still a politician - that if you say the lie enough times you will get someone to believe you. I am not one of those.

 

No lie was presented.   Your belief is in a myth of your own making.   Personally, I like to think using facts and scientific terms.

 

 

Msmal, I beg you ever-lovin pardon, but it IS MPW that burns fossil fuel and not GPC and my info was from the EPA. I do hope you will keep your schedule free to try to explain what Republican posts here as it certainly needs explaining.

My comment about repeationg a lie enough times you will get someone to believe you - guess what - you're it!

Perhaps you might want to go back and read Republican's posts and see how many times he lambasts GPC. That is why I say that he wants to crucify GPC. But please keep yourself free to defend him as he needs it.

 

BTW - use your scientific term look -up and see what fossil fuels are.

  • Stock
  • mallory
  • Respected Neighbor
  • USA
  • 3461 Posts
  • Respect-O-Meter: Respected Neighbor

Msmal, I beg you ever-lovin pardon, but it IS MPW that burns fossil fuel and not GPC and my info was from the EPA. I do hope you will keep your schedule free to try to explain what Republican posts here as it certainly needs explaining.

My comment about repeationg a lie enough times you will get someone to believe you - guess what - you're it!

Perhaps you might want to go back and read Republican's posts and see how many times he lambasts GPC. That is why I say that he wants to crucify GPC. But please keep yourself free to defend him as he needs it.

 

BTW - use your scientific term look -up and see what fossil fuels are.


I showed you precisely where GPC's coal pile and chimneys are and you didn't look at it and repeated your erroneous statement that GPC doesn't burn coal.   You could have even looked at both GPC's and MPW's coal piles at the same time and compared their sizes.   They're not that far apart.

 

God, I well know what fossil fuels are without further instruction or references.

 

GPC not only burns coal but they have over a hundred other emission sites where the emissions are from the process.   Like drying or cooking.   For some of these they use steam which they get from MPW.   You can also see the steam pipe running from MPW to GPC if you look.   It goes just west of the GPC coal pile.   I also think GPC should take some responsibility for the emmisions from the coal burned to make this steam.

Advertise Here!

Promote Your Business or Product for $10/mo

istockphoto_2518034-hot-pizza.jpg

For just $10/mo you can promote your business or product directly to nearby residents. Buy 12 months and save 50%!

Buynow